Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hu Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$246kCivil Rights$44kScience & Tech$4kArts & Culture$1kEnvironment$900Animals$179Health$70
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,350
Median grant
4
States reached
$853k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU$14,500
University of Pennsylvania$6,000
MIT Alumni Association$5,350
THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation$5,000
California Academy Of Sciences$379
CuriOdyssey$185
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 10%MIT Alumni Association: $12k → 8%University of Pennsylvania: $6k → 22%Stanford University: $10k → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $250 → 12%BARDCOLLEGE: $500 → 9%NYU: $21k → 17%Enviromential Working Group: $250 → 14%Students for Fair Admissions: $1k → 7%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%MIT Alumni Association: $10k → 8%University of Pennsylvania: $3k → 22%California Academy Of Sciences: $379 → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $250 → 12%NYU: $15k → 17%Students for Fair Admissions: $1k → 7%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%MIT Alumni Association: $6k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $25k → 8%California Academy Of Sciences: $349 → 10%NYU: $10k → 17%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%MIT Alumni Association: $5k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $17k → 8%California Academy Of Sciences: $329 → 10%NYU: $8k → 17%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 10%MIT Alumni Association: $4k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $16k → 8%California Academy Of Sciences: $299 → 10%NYU: $7k → 17%Mathmematics Foundation of America: $1k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $12k → 8%Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco: $299 → 10%NYU: $6k → 17%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $11k → 8%California Academy Of Sciences: $299 → 10%NYU: $5k → 17%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $10k → 8%NYU: $5k → 17%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $10k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $5k → 8%WikiMedia Foundation: $1k → 10%THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation: $5k → 8%WikiMedia Foundation: $250 → 10%The Tech Museum of Innovation: $265 → 8%Computer History Museum: $1k → 8%Computer History Museum: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
DE
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$275k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$275k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+81%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHealthEducationAnimalsScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 8E
    80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $42k · revenue +60%
  • CH
    COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +61%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • MF
    MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +102%
  • BARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +241%
  • EW
    ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUPgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250 · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
3
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
4
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
5
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
10
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

12
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Exploratorium and the most unlike its peers is 80-20 Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%77%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE HARKER SCHOOL Foundation — $110,774 · OtherTHE HARKER SCHOOL FoundationNYU — $76,000 · OtherNYUMIT Alumni Association — $36,146 · OtherMIT Alumni Association+9 more — $1,594 · Other80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 · Civil Rights80-20 EDUCATIONA…Students For Fair Admissions Inc — $2,000 · Civil RightsTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $8,500 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,724 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM — $2,123 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,655 · Arts & CultureTHE TECH INTERACTIVE — $628 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $418 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM — $199 · Arts & CultureCURIODYSSEY — $185 · Arts & CultureMATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $500 · AnimalsSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $179 · AnimalsENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $250 · Environment
Other$224,514Civil Rights$44,000Education$20,724Arts & Culture$5,208Youth Development$1,000Animals$679Environment$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM — $2,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStudents For Fair Admissions Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,724 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,655 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SARATOGA LIBRARIES — $900 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE — $628 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $418 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM — $199 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $179 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hu Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph