Skip to content
Hp Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hp Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.6MEducation$437kHuman Services$107kRecreation & Sports$30kYouth Development$17kHealth$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH CHILDREN'S FUND$4,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER: $8k → 12%MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER: $5k → 12%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $18k → 11%THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $800 → 17%THE CHILDREN'S BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM: $10k → 17%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
SC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 34 repeat orgs$626k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
66

Total granted

$2.6M
$626k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+44%

Still filing today

26%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    CAMP YAVNEH INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $27k · revenue +85%
  • LE
    Lanaar Elementary School Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +170%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES
    3× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS YISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • BC
    Broward CHAI Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue +38% · 37% of their budget
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BEIS SHMUEL CHABAD
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Chabad Jewish Center

The Organization operates an religious outreach center to promote and understand Judaism and the laws of Kosher.

Human Services
4
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
10
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
11
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Judaea Sprout Lake Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mp Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
25/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF ALABAMA: $926,770 · OtherCHABAD OF ALABAMASALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY: $381,015 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMYCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INC: $367,494 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INCCHABAD OF S FRANCISCO INC: $236,000 · OtherCHABAD OF S FRANCISCO INCBEIT HASHEM NEHALECH INC: $106,500 · OtherVAAD HANOCHOS HATMIMIM INC: $101,000 · Other+73 more: $821,891 · Other+73 moreBroward CHAI Center Inc: $60,000 · ReligionAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $25,000 · ReligionTHE BNEI TORAH TRUST: $20,000 · ReligionLUBAVITCH CENTER OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $20,000 · ReligionAISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES: $14,000 · ReligionSOLOMON CENTER INC: $11,000 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Merkos Linyonei Chinuch Chabad Lubavitch of Finland Inc: $10,000 · ReligionCAMP MORASHA INC: $5,700 · Religion+1 more: $3,000 · ReligionTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $18,000 · Human ServicesMEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER: $12,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $800 · Human ServicesLanaar Elementary School Inc: $18,105 · EducationLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN: $12,600 · EducationSHEFA SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL: $5,000 · PhilanthropyChevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp: $12,500 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED JEWISH CHILDRENS FUND INC: $9,400 · Youth Development
Other$2,940,670Religion$168,700Human Services$49,300Education$35,705Philanthropy$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,500Youth Development$9,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBroward CHAI Center Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetCAMP YAVNEH INC: $27,349 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BNEI TORAH TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLUBAVITCH CENTER OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetLanaar Elementary School Inc: $18,105 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES: $14,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN: $12,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER: $12,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetChevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp: $12,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $11,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOLOMON CENTER INC: $11,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of Merkos Linyonei Chinuch Chabad Lubavitch of Finland Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH CHILDRENS FUND INC: $9,400 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC: $6,720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEMARA ACADEMY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCAMP MORASHA INC: $5,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS HATZOLO AID INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATIONAL MEDIA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP INC: $2,695 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIsrael Chai Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Broward CHAI Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP YAVNEH INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BNEI TORAH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBAVITCH CENTER OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lanaar Elementary School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds LURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN ↗
  • Who funds MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Chevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Rapoport Family F…The Ojc FundNash Charity Foundati…Jewish Community Foun…FjcRebbe's Partnership F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Falic Family Priv…Saul Schottenstein Fo…Lets Make It Happen N…
Jewish Communal FundNY38.1× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fjc · Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Falic Family Private Foundation · Saul Schottenstein Foundation C · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Special Children Center: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home