Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

58% of Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Greater Dallas, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
4
’19
3
’20
3
’21
4
’22
1
’23
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$550kArts & Culture$532kHuman Services$164kPhilanthropy$153kEducation$137k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS$30,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS: $22k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INCORPORATED: $22k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+27%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    Dallas Museum of Art
    2× · 2017–2021 · $203k · revenue +396%
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $179k · revenue +37%
  • TN
    THE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $110k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CB
    CORNERSTONE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • DC
    DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • SP
    ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +162%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Dallas Architecture Forum

The Forum educates, enriches and connects our community by presenting programs and events, creating experiences, and engaging global and local thought-leaders from the design fields to enhance how we live.

Arts & Culture
3
Dallas Contemporary

Dallas contemporary presents art in a forum that cultivates artists, ignites learning and inspires the community. dallas contemporary is a non-collecting art museum presenting new and challenging ideas from regional, national and…

Arts & Culture
4
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Community Center of Dallas

The jcc of dallas brings the community together by providing state of the art facilities and exceptional programs in an inclusive environment defined by jewish values and culture.

Recreation & Sports
6
Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation
Community Improvement
7
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
Dallas Tourism Public Improvement District Corporation

The dallas tourism public improvement district ("dtpid") is a public improvement district dedicated to improving convention and group hotel bookings and hotel room night consumption in the city of dallas, texas.

Community Improvement
9
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Dallas Chamber Symphony

Increase community involvement to advance music and art through education events and our TechNotes curriculum, group collaborations, film and instrument competitions, performance jobs, and general public concerts

Arts & Culture
11
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
12
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is Downtown Dallas Parks Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCY: $550,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCYDallas Museum of Art: $202,940 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of ArtDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $178,820 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIONTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $110,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTERDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BARACK OBAMA LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BARACK OBAMA L…Jewish Federation of Greater Houston: $90,000 · OtherJewish Federation of Grea…CORNERSTONE BAPTIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE BAPTIST CHURC…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $48,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 · OtherST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COM…+5 more: $35,000 · Other+5 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $60,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $56,000 · Human ServicesLUMIN EDUCATION: $1,960 · Education
Community Improvement$550,000Arts & Culture$521,760Other$343,000Philanthropy$62,500Human Services$56,000Education$1,960

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCY: $550,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $202,940 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $178,820 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $110,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $90,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $56,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGlasstire: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUMIN EDUCATION: $1,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard Earl Rachofsky Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard Earl Rachofsky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph