Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Houston Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$593kHealth$149kHuman Services$71kEducation$55kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$30kYouth Development$28kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN LYNCH SPEAKS$105,000
FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES$20,140
SANCTUARY CHURCH$10,000
TULSA LIBRARY TRUST$10,000
REFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP$10,000
RIVER OAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,200
JOHN 15 ACADEMY$5,000
YOUR ONE DEGREE$3,600
DAY OF HOPE INC$3,000
YOUNG LIFE$2,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
IN
OH
PA
AZ
NC
OK
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Houston Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Houston Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$824k · 14 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$824k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+5%

Still filing today

36%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JL
    JOHN LYNCH SPEAKS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $347k · revenue +76% · 34% of their budget
  • YA
    YOD ASSOCIATES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +40%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • UW
    UP WITH TREES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +74%
  • GA
    Generation Alivegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
4
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
6
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
7
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
8
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
9
Our Daughters International

We exist to bring an end to human trafficking in Nepal, and to see lives and communities transformed

Human Services
10
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
11
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
12
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Nehi Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUEFACE — $130,000 · OtherTRUEFACERIVEROAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TULSA PCA INC — $111,970 · OtherRIVEROAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TULSA PCA INCREFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP PCA — $30,000 · OtherREFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP PCAHEARTS OF STEEL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPE — $25,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $24,000 · OtherUP WITH TREES INC — $20,000 · Other+16 more — $131,400 · Other+16 moreJOHN LYNCH SPEAKS INC — $346,500 · ReligionJOHN LYNCH SPEAKS INCYOD ASSOCIATES INC — $37,600 · ReligionYOD ASSOCIATES INCFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC — $30,140 · Arts & CultureGeneration Alive — $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $1,583 · Human ServicesTHE DEMAND PROJECT INC — $13,500 · Crime & LegalTulsa Library Trust — $10,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF TENWEK INC — $5,000 · HealthNEHI Research Foundation — $1,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$522,370Religion$384,100Arts & Culture$30,140Youth Development$28,000Human Services$21,583Crime & Legal$13,500Education$10,000Health$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHN LYNCH SPEAKS INC — $346,500 over 4y, 34% of budgetYOD ASSOCIATES INC — $37,600 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC — $30,140 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGeneration Alive — $17,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE DEMAND PROJECT INC — $13,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Library Trust — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF TENWEK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $1,583 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEHI Research Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN LYNCH SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds YOD ASSOCIATES INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC
  • Who funds UP WITH TREES INC
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC
  • Who funds Generation Alive
  • Who funds THE DEMAND PROJECT INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
  • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TENWEK INC
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES
  • Who funds NEHI Research Foundation
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Oxley Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Waters Charitable Foundation · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Ruth Nelson Family Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Houston Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 100%
  • Up With Trees Inc100% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph