· Public charity
Housing Preservation Inc
To provide affordable residential rental units to low income individuals and families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $110,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $125,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER MEMPHIS CHAMBER | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE | $30,000 |
| HUTCHISON SCHOOL | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PDPRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL4× · 2020–2023 · $150k · revenue +32%
- THTHE HUTCHISON SCHOOL5× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +59%
- CACREATIVE AGING MEMPHIS4× · 2019–2023 · $48k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- AGAMERICAN GI FORUM NATIONAL VETERANS OUTREACH PROGRAM INCone grant, 2022 · $3.4M · revenue -1%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INCone grant, 2020 · $1.8M · revenue -97% · 33% of their budget
- MCMENORAH CAMPUS INCone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.
Memphis union mission exists to glorify god and make disciples of jesus christ by ministering to the physical, spiritual, and emotional needs of men and women who are homeless or destitute.
Building on our over 100 year tradition of excellence, we offer a full continuum of enriched living, compassionate care, and benevolence to a broad spectrum of individuals. we promote a lifestyle of growth, creativity and independence,…
Housing placement for homeless
Tennessee baptist adult homes, inc. (tbah) is a benevolent christian ministry providing quality residential care for senior adults and adults with exceptional needs.
Provide subsidized housing (87 unit complex) for elderly low income seniors under section 202 of the national housing act and the u.s. department of housing and urban development.
Plough towers is a 150-unit, government rent-assisted, high-rise apartment community which seeks to provide safe, affordable housing for the elderly and mobility impaired in an environment that enhances self worth, dignity and encourages…
Provide housing and services as a licensed residential home for the aged.
Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises
Dignity Housing's mission is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that confronts low-income families and individuals in the City of Philadelphia.
We are a church related, non-profit organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults by creating and preserving excellent residential facilities. we believe in and are committed to honoring each person's dignity,…
The mission of presbyterian homes housing & assisted living, inc. is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Menorah Campus Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Quality Housing Opportunities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN GI FORUM NATIONAL VETERANS OUTREACH PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MENORAH CAMPUS INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE PARK TOWERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE HUTCHISON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds FIRST BAPTIST HOUSING OF BRIDGEPORT ↗
- Who funds Binghampton Christian Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE AGING MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds Victory Ranch ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association ↗
- Who funds Victims of Illicit Drugs Inc ↗
- Who funds Memphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · The Day Foundation · Deborah D Tipton Charitable Foundation · Elmer & Gladys Ferguson Charitable Trust · Thomas Garrott Foundation · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Memphis · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Housing Preservation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc — 33% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Housing Preservation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Housing Preservation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.