Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Hotelgamingrestaurant & Club Employees & Bartenders Union Local 6 Afl-Cio

Provide union members with representation in accordance with collective bargaining agreements negotiated with various employers

$246k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of HOTELGAMINGRESTAURANT & CLUB EMPLOYEES & BARTENDERS UNION LOCAL 6 AFL-CIO’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $240,543 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $246,193 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,650 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $192k
$191,545
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOCAL 6 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION$191,545
UNITE HERE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$48,998
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $25k → 20%HEARTSHARE SAINT VINCENT'S SERVICES: $10k → 20%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $5k → 20%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $13k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $13k → 17%NYHTC AFL CIO RELIEF FUND INC: $150k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 10 repeat orgs$947k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$4.3M
$899k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+30%

Still filing today

80%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +65%
  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k · revenue +35%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNION HELP
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · 50% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & UNITE HERE LOCAL 6 PAC
    one grant, 2019 · $205k
  • NY
    NEW YORK HOTEL & MOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AFL-CIO RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Legal Assistance Group Inc

Please see schedule o for full mission statement

—
2
New York City Hospitality Alliance Inc

The organization is a trade association for providers of hospitality services in new york city. its' purpose is to advocate on behalf of the industry, conduct educational programs on laws and regulations, lobby government agencies and…

Community Improvement
3
Ny Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Assoc of Nyc Inc Training & Scholarship

To provide industry training and scholarships to union members and their dependents of the new york hotel trades council working in the hotel industry of new york city.

—
4
Upstate New York Construction Industry Research & Service Tr Fund

To assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process, to improve the employment opportunities for employees, to expand the market for the construction…

Employment
5
New York Law School Alumni Association Inc

To support and promote the school, its students, and its alumni.

—
6
Professional Staff Congress Cuny

Psc is a labor union that represents nearly 30,000 active and retired faculty and staff at cuny and the cuny research foundation. the psc's mission is to advance the professional lives of our members, enhance their terms and conditions of…

—
7
New York City Tourism Conventions Inc

To build new york city's economy and positive image through tourism and convention development, major events and the marketing of the city on a worldwide basis.

—
8
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
9
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
New York Housing Conference Inc

NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…

Housing & Shelter
12
Laborers International Union of North America

The association was established to represent employees covered by collective bargaining agreements between the union and various employers in the catholic educational institutions in the new york city and long island geographic areas.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York City Tourism Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Black Law Students Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr21%19%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr11%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%48%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr21%11%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr11%24%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
11%
4,169/36,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOCAL 6 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION — $3,144,522 · OtherLOCAL 6 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONHOTEL WORKERS FOR STRONGER COMMUNITIES — $940,000 · OtherHOTEL WORKERS FOR STRONGER COMMUNITIESNEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & UNITE HERE LOCAL 6 PAC — $205,000 · Other+11 more — $249,998 · Other+11 moreUNION HELP — $250,000 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more — $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNEW YORK HOTEL & MOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AFL-CIO RELIEF FUND INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesPEGGY BROWNING FUND — $25,000 · EducationCornell University — $25,000 · EducationNEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · EducationIUOE LOCAL 94 94A SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $13,650 · EducationNEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF BLACKPUERTO RICAN HISPANIC & ASIAN LEGISLATOR — $10,000 · EducationAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA — $50,000 · InternationalCAREERS THROUGH CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM DBA CULINARY CAREERS PROGRAM — $35,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,539,520Public Safety & Disaster$256,000Human Services$220,000Education$96,150International$50,000Employment$35,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNION HELP — $250,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetLOCAL UNION NO 3 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAREERS THROUGH CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM DBA CULINARY CAREERS PROGRAM — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCornell University — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey State AFL-CIO COPE — $25,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetNEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetIUOE LOCAL 94 94A SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $13,650 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $13,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREMEMBER THE TRIANGLE FIRE COALITION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASITA MARIA INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHANYC FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMICHAELS MISSION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW JERSEY TOGETHER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hotel and Gaming Trad…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Hotel and Gaming Trades Council Afl-CioNY28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hotel and Gaming Trades Council Afl-Cio · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hotelgamingrestaurant & Club Employees & Bartenders Union Local 6 Afl-Cio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hotelgamingrestaurant & Club Employees & Bartenders Union Local 6 Afl-Cio?

    Find your warmest path to Hotelgamingrestaurant & Club Employees & Bartenders Union Local 6 Afl-Cio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines