Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kArts & Culture$26kHuman Services$26kReligion$24kEducation$19kPhilanthropy$11kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$944k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE$9,000
VIGILANT HOSE COMPANY$4,000
WEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY$4,000
SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY$4,000
UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA$3,000
OASIS OF LOVE CHURCH$3,000
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC$3,000
DREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION$2,000
UPRISE EVENTS LIVE$2,000
CHRIST AMONG NEIGHBORS$2,000
SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE & OUTREACH$2,000
SHIPPENSBURG KIDS EVENTS COMMITTEE INC$2,000
CIRCLE OF LOVE OUTREACH PROGRAM$1,000
SHIPPENSBURG AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO$1,000
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL: $20k → 8%SPIRITRUST LUTHERAN HOME CARE & HOS: $3k → 9%SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE & OUTREACH: $2k → 9%SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $15k → 8%SPIRITRUST LUTHERAN HOME CARE & HOS: $3k → 9%SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE & OUTREACH: $2k → 9%BOROUGH OF SHIPPENSBURG: $12k → 8%UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $2k → 9%FRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL: $10k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE & OUTREACH: $2k → 9%FRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL: $10k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $9k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $9k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $9k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG COMMUNITY PARKS & REC: $7k → 8%VIGILANT HOSE COMPANY: $6k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $6k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $6k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG COMM PARKS & REC AUTHOR: $5k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 8%CROSS INC: $5k → 8%CROSS INC: $4k → 8%WEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY: $4k → 8%WEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY: $4k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 8%VIGILANT HOSE COMPANY: $4k → 8%DREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%VIGILANT HOSE COMPANY: $3k → 8%UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $3k → 8%KATIE'S PLACE OF SHIPPENSBURG INC: $3k → 8%CROSS INC: $3k → 8%VIGILANT HOSE COMPANY: $3k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $3k → 8%UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $3k → 8%WEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY: $3k → 8%OASIS OF LOVE CHURCH: $3k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $3k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $3k → 8%CROSS INC: $3k → 8%UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $3k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $3k → 8%DREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%UPRISE EVENT LIVE: $2k → 8%SHIPPENSBURG KIDS EVENTS COMMITTEE INC: $2k → 8%DREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 14 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$228k
$25k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentPublic BenefitEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +18% · 27% of their budget
  • VH
    Vigilant Hose Company No 1
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +108%
  • SU
    SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • SC
    SHIPPENSBURG COMMUNITY PARKS & REC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • SC
    SHIPPENSBURG COMM PARKS & REC AUTHOR
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springettsbury Township Volunteer Fire Company

Community fire protection services

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Shippensburg Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the shippensburg area chamber of commerce is to provide members with services that promote and support economic vitality as well as develop shippensburg as a great place to live, work, play, visit, and invest.

—
3
Sharpsburg Neighborhood Organization

Community development, outreach and enrichment of sharpsburg, pennsylvania.

—
4
Midway Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection for the borough of midway, pa and the surrounding area

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Shippenville-Elk Twp Volunteer Fire Department

Fire fighting, rescue and other emergency services

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Cochran Hose Company Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Somerset Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Shippensburg Community Fair Inc

To organize a general summer fair of interest to all segments of the community of shippensburg and surrounding areas. to educate and inform the public about agricultural products and services, as well as provide a venue for family…

Recreation & Sports
9
Upper Saucon Vol Fire Dept No 1

Fire & Rescue Company

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
11
Crawford County Federated Library System

Organization formed to support member libraries in crawford county, pa

Education
12
New WIlmington Volunteer Firemens Assoc Co John Geidner

To provide Fire Protection and Emergency Services to the Community

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Shippensburg Area; the most unlike its peers is Cumberland Valley Community Connections. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUE: $48,000 · OtherSHIPPENSBURG AREA LITTLE LEAGUESHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $26,000 · OtherSHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCVigilant Hose Company No 1: $18,000 · OtherVigilant Hose Company No 1CROSS INC: $15,000 · OtherCROSS INCWEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY: $15,000 · OtherWEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANYIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE UNITED WAY OF THE SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $11,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY OF THE SHIPPENSBURG AREASHIPPENSBURG COMMUNITY PARKS & REC: $7,000 · OtherSPIRITRUST LUTHERAN HOME CARE & HOS: $6,000 · Other+6 more: $13,000 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL INC: $40,000 · Public BenefitFRIENDS OF MEMORI…SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationDREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropySHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCHRIST AMONG NEIGHBORS: $7,000 · Community ImprovementKATIE'S PLACE OF SHIPPENSBURG INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCUMBERLAND VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentUPRISE EVENTS LIVE INC SCOTT BROWN: $4,000 · Religion
Other$171,000Public Benefit$40,000Education$18,000Philanthropy$8,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Community Improvement$7,000Youth Development$6,000Religion$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL INC: $40,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetSHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $26,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetVigilant Hose Company No 1: $18,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF THE SHIPPENSBURG AREA: $11,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetDREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH: $7,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHRIST AMONG NEIGHBORS: $7,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetKATIE'S PLACE OF SHIPPENSBURG INC: $5,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Vigilant Hose Company No 1 ↗
  • Who funds SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF THE SHIPPENSBURG AREA ↗
  • Who funds DREW MICHAEL TAYLOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST AMONG NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds KATIE'S PLACE OF SHIPPENSBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds UPRISE EVENTS LIVE INC SCOTT BROWN ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carl L and Glenda T Cramer Charitable FoundationPA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carl L and Glenda T Cramer Charitable Foundation · Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed · Partnership for Better Health · Elmer E Naugle Foundation 001531 · The United Way of the Shippensburg Area · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph