Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Horse Creek Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$369kEducation$179kHealth$48kReligion$13kEnvironment$11kFood & Nutrition$6kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY$30,000
WITTE MUSEUM$21,200
ST PAUL'S SCHOOL$20,000
MCNAY ART MUSEUM$17,500
Washington & Lee University$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$9,050
SAINT MARY'S HALL INC$7,500
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
San Antonio Food Bank Inc$5,000
Millsaps College$5,000
HOTCHKISS SCHOOL$3,000
MISSION HERITAGE PARTNERS$2,500
THE DOSEUM SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$2,500
CONTEMPORARY ART FOR SAN ANTONIO$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
CT
CA
VA
NC
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$611k · 24 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$611k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +183%
  • SP
    ST PAUL'S SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • TB
    TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RM
    REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • HH
    HERITAGE HOUSE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2024 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Tyler Museum of Art

Educational and cultural center to enrich lives through collection, study, exhibition, interpretation and celebration of visual arts.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
7
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
8
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
10
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Botanical Garden Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kerrville Perpetual Care Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesPublic Library OperationsCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Local History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 72 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%22%35–55yr13%56%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%5%35–55yr13%77%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MCNAY ART MUSEUM — $152,000 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUSEUMTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC — $81,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INCWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $60,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTWitte Museum — $26,000 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum+5 more — $28,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreST PAUL'S SCHOOL — $45,000 · EducationST PAUL'S SCHOOLWashington and Lee University — $36,000 · EducationWashington and Lee UniversitySAINT MARYS HALL INC — $26,800 · EducationSAINT MARYS HALL INCDUKE UNIVERSITY — $24,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $22,000 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOLCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES — $10,500 · EducationCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND…+2 more — $8,500 · EducationTHE DOSEUM SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $15,000 · OtherTHE DOSEU…CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $13,000 · OtherCHRIST EP…SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $5,700 · OtherSAN ANTON…LANDA GARDENS CONSERVANCY — $4,500 · OtherLANDA GAR…BLUE STAR CONTEMPORARY ART SAN ANTONIO — $3,000 · OtherBLUE STAR…SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART — $3,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST…HERITAGE HOUSE PARTNERS — $2,500 · OtherLOS COMPADRES DE SAN ANTONIO — $2,500 · Other+4 more — $4,000 · Other+4 moreTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $42,700 · HealthSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $10,500 · EnvironmentREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE — $5,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $3,500 · Animals
Arts & Culture$347,000Education$172,800Other$53,200Health$42,700Environment$10,500Human Services$5,000Animals$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $152,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC — $81,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $42,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARYS HALL INC — $26,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWitte Museum — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES — $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTPACE INC (AUDIT) — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $5,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMillsaps College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANDA GARDENS CONSERVANCY — $4,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART FOR SAN ANTONIO — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKERRVILLE PERPETUAL CARE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brown Foundation IncTX25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brown Foundation Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · San Antonio Area Foundation · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Muriel F Siebert Foundation Inc · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Roger L and Laura D Zeller Charitable Foundation · The Jesse H and Susan R Oppenheimer Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Mays Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Horse Creek Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Horse Creek Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Horse Creek Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph