Skip to content
Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia

Our mission is to end addiction in Appalachia through events that support substance abuse prevention and recovery programs.

$783k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$909kHousing & Shelter$67kHuman Services$60kCrime & Legal$26kArts & Culture$25kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $685,506, the rows itemized in this filing. The $783,032 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $97,526 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $502k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $165k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Recovery Point of WV$61,500
Seed Sower Inc$53,500
Higher Ground Womens Rec$50,000
Brookes Hope Inc$40,000
Pathways to Bright Futures$32,000
Recovery Resources$32,000
SOAR WV$30,000
Community Education Group$29,950
Appalachian Research & Def$26,000
Laurens Wish Addiction$25,000
WV Alliance of Recovery Res$25,000
Eagles Nest Regeneration$21,450
WVU Foundation$20,000
Fayetteville County Health$20,000
Libera Inc$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Seed Sower Inc: $54k → 15%Libera Inc: $20k → 19%Eagles Nest Regeneration: $21k → 12%Higher Ground Womens Rec: $50k → 24%Center for Fathers & Family: $30k → 15%Eagles Nest Regeneration: $14k → 12%West Virginia Healing Home: $10k → 18%Libera Inc: $10k → 19%East Greenbrier Middle School: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CA
KY
WV
VA
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$336k · 10 repeat orgs$788k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$336k
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+2%

Still filing today

70%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $526k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    EAGLES NEST REGENERATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue +12%
  • HI
    HELLO IN THERE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue +26%
  • U
    UNMANAGEABLE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +498%

Funded once

  • GW
    Gods Way Home Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $37k · revenue -24%
  • EG
    East Greenbrier Middle School
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • CC
    Commonwealth Center for Fathers and Families Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Recovery Communities of North Carolina Inc
Human Services
2
Addiction Recovery Foundation
—
3
Rockbridge Recovery

Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.

Health
4
Crossroads Recovery House
—
5
New Life Recovery Services
Health
6
Charlies Place Recovery Center

Alcohol and Drug Rehabilitation

—
7
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
8
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
9
Choices for Recovery Inc
Health
10
R3 Recovery Services Inc

At R3 Recovery Services, our mission is to provide a structured, measurable, and transformative path to recovery one that makes progress tangible and understandable. We recognize that addiction leaves behind collateral damage, affecting…

Housing & Shelter
11
Hope Ridge Recovery Inc

Provide safe haven for recovering women

Health
12
Beauty for Ashes Women's Home Inc

Drug addiction rehabilitation program

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Healing Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Artists and Musicians in Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
17/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RECOVERY POINT WEST VIRGINIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $61,500 · HealthRECOVERY POINT WEST VIRGINIA BEHAVIORAL…RECOVERY RESOURCES: $52,650 · HealthRECOVERY RESOURCESBROOKES HOPE INC: $40,000 · HealthBROOKES HOPE INCPATHWAYS TO BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION: $32,000 · HealthPATHWAYS TO BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATIONSOLUTIONS ORIENTED ADDICTION RESPONSE: $30,000 · HealthSOLUTIONS ORIENTED ADDICTION RESPONSECOMMUNITY EDUCATION GROUP INC: $29,950 · HealthCOMMUNITY EDUCATION GROUP INCLAURENS WISH ADDICTION TRIAGE CENTE: $25,000 · HealthLAURENS WISH ADDICTION TRIAGE CENTEMUSICIANS FOR OVERDOSE PREVENTION INC: $24,000 · HealthMUSICIANS FOR OVERDOSE PREVENTION INCRECOVERY ROWAN COUNTY INCORPORATED: $20,000 · HealthOne80 Recovery Resources Inc: $20,000 · HealthThe Steady Collective Inc: $15,000 · HealthHoller Harm Reduction: $15,000 · Health+3 more: $30,750 · Health+3 moreFayetteville County Health: $57,000 · OtherFayetteville County HealthCENTER FOR HUMAN ENGAGEMENT INC: $52,489 · OtherCENTER FOR HUMAN ENGAGEMENT…East Greenbrier Middle School: $30,000 · OtherEast Greenbrier Middle Scho…Wayne County Housing Inc: $20,000 · OtherWayne County Housing IncBRIDGE TO SHORE GROUP: $17,000 · OtherBRIDGE TO SHORE GROUPTENNESSEE ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $16,000 · OtherTENNESSEE ALLIANCE OF RECOV…WARREN COUNTY PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION COALITION: $15,000 · OtherWARREN COUNTY PREVENTION AN…Lotus Recovery Cntrs Comfort: $10,000 · OtherAppalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky Inc: $26,000 · OtherAppalachian Research and De…BECKLEY DREAM CENTER INC DBA FISHES AND LOAVES: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $20,556 · Other+3 moreSEED SOWER INC: $53,500 · Human ServicesSEED SOWER INCHigher Ground & Womens Recovery Residence: $50,000 · Human ServicesHigher Ground & Women…EAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $41,950 · Human ServicesEAGLES NEST REGENERAT…Commonwealth Center for Fathers and Families Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesCommonwealth Center f…Libera Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesLibera IncWest Virginia Healing Home Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesGods Way Home Inc: $37,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $16,900 · Housing & ShelterMORGANTOWN SOBER LIVING INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureUNMANAGEABLE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureGreen River Academy Preservation Society Inc: $13,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationEMERALD SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE INC: $18,000 · EducationARTISTS AND MUSICIANS IN RECOVERY: $10,000 · EducationHELLO IN THERE FOUNDATION: $24,261 · PhilanthropyLions Clubs International Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKeith Dixon Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$395,850Other$274,045Human Services$215,450Housing & Shelter$78,900Arts & Culture$68,000Education$48,000Philanthropy$44,261

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRECOVERY POINT WEST VIRGINIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $61,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetRECOVERY RESOURCES: $52,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHigher Ground & Womens Recovery Residence: $50,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetEAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $41,950 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGods Way Home Inc: $37,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetPATHWAYS TO BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetCommonwealth Center for Fathers and Families Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLibera Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHELLO IN THERE FOUNDATION: $24,261 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMUSICIANS FOR OVERDOSE PREVENTION INC: $24,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNMANAGEABLE: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRECOVERY ROWAN COUNTY INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOne80 Recovery Resources Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetEMERALD SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $16,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Steady Collective Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHoller Harm Reduction: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMORGANTOWN SOBER LIVING INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREENBRIER COUNTY EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $10,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRecovery Community Network Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS AND MUSICIANS IN RECOVERY: $10,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetWest Virginia Healing Home Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetKeith Dixon Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetHAWC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $8,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-STATE CHARITIES INC: $5,156 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha V…West Virginia First F…Claude Worthington Be…Dogwood Health TrustNetwork for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · West Virginia First Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia?

    Find your warmest path to Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home