Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hooda Germack Trust Uw Article Eighth Myles Davis Trustee

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$958k
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Public Safety & Disaster$382kReligion$250kHealth$240kHuman Services$153kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$30kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $770k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAVO AMBULANCE SERVICE$214,500
NYU LANGONE HEALTH$180,000
ST ANTHONY THE GREAT ORTHODOX CHURCH$110,000
ST NICHOLAS ANTOCHIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL$107,500
GUILD FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN$107,500
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
ST MARY'S ORTHODOX CHURCH$32,500
STEPHEN STILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$25,000
BAY RIDGE CARES$25,000
OUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC ACADEMY$25,000
GRANDMA'S LOVE INC$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MIXTECA$20,000
HOLY APOSTLES SOUP KITCHEN$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIXTECA: $20k → 20%BAY RIDGE CARES: $25k → 20%GUILD FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN: $108k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAVO AMBULANCE SERVICE: $381,752 · OtherBRAVO AMBULANCE SERVICENYU LANGONE HEALTH: $180,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHST ANTHONY THE GREAT ORTHODOX CHURCH: $110,000 · OtherST ANTHONY THE GREAT ORTHODOX CHURCHST NICHOLAS ANTOCHIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $107,500 · OtherST NICHOLAS ANTOCHIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRALST MARY'S ORTHODOX CHURCH: $32,500 · Other+5 more: $66,000 · Other+5 moreTHE GUILD FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC: $107,500 · Human ServicesTHE GUILD FOR E…BAY RIDGE CARES: $25,000 · Human ServicesBAY RIDGE CARESMIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMIXTECA ORGANIZ…NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationGRANDMAS LOVE INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$877,752Human Services$152,500Health$50,000Education$25,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GUILD FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC: $107,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY RIDGE CARES: $25,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetMIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGRANDMAS LOVE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GUILD FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAY RIDGE CARES ↗
  • Who funds MIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANDMAS LOVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hooda Germack Trust Uw Article Eighth Myles Davis Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hooda Germack Trust Uw Article Eighth Myles Davis Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hooda Germack Trust Uw Article Eighth Myles Davis Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph