Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Honda Marine Science Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$485k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182021.

Environment$933kScience & Tech$92kAnimals$85kEducation$76k
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$85,229
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATURE CONSERVATORY$100,000
CALIFORNIA OCEAN SCIENCE TRUST$92,257
SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY$85,229
DUKE UNIVERSITY$75,926
EARTHCORPS$75,702
CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT UCSD$56,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER: $110k → 10%OIKONOS: $50k → 10%CALIFORNIA OCEAN SCIENCE TRUST: $92k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $85k → 11%LA LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA)- THE BAY FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION: $70k → 12%EARTHCORPS: $76k → 9%NORTHWEST STRAITS FOUNDATION: $65k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVATORY: $100k → 7%SMITHONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER: $75k → 6%ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER: $75k → 10%SAVE THE BAY: $75k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $76k → 12%WEST MAUI LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (HAWAII) - CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $57k → 10%CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT UCSD: $56k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
2
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
3
San Francisco Estuary Institute

Provide scientific support and tools for decision making and communication through collaborative efforts.

Environment
4
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
5
Bay Nature Institute dba Bay Nature Bay Nature Magazine

Bay Nature connects the people of the San Francisco Bay Area to our natural world and motivates people to solve problems with nature in mind. Our vision is that all people have a close relationship with theirnatural world.

Environment
6
Turtle Island Restoration Network

To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.

Environment
7
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
8
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
9
Sea to Shore Alliance

Research, education and conservation work to improve the health & productivity of coastal envirmonments for endangered species & human livlihoods that depend on them.

10
Santa Barbara Channelkeeper Inc

The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.

Environment
11
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
12
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Ocean Science Trust and the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVATORY — $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVATORYLA LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA)- THE BAY FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherLA LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA)…NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC — $69,574 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INCNORTHWEST STRAITS FOUNDATION — $65,000 · OtherNORTHWEST STRAITS FOUNDATIONWEST MAUI LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (HAWAII) - CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $57,200 · OtherWEST MAUI LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT (HAWAII) - COR…CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT UCSD — $56,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA SEA GRANT UCSDZEDLER MARSH LIVING SHORELINES PROJECT (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA) - LOS CERRITOS — $50,000 · OtherZEDLER MARSH LIVING SHORELINES PROJECT (SOUTHERN …OIKONOS — $50,000 · OtherOIKONOSOrange County Coastkeeper — $184,988 · EnvironmentOrange County CoastkeeperCalifornia Ocean Science Trust — $92,257 · EnvironmentCalifornia Ocean Science TrustSan Diego Bird Alliance — $85,229 · EnvironmentSan Diego Bird AllianceSave The Bay — $75,000 · EnvironmentSave The BayDUKE UNIVERSITY — $75,926 · EducationEarthcorps — $75,702 · InternationalSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $74,932 · Arts & Culture
Other$522,774Environment$437,474Education$75,926International$75,702Arts & Culture$74,932

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOrange County Coastkeeper — $184,988 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCalifornia Ocean Science Trust — $92,257 over 1y, 11% of budgetSan Diego Bird Alliance — $85,229 over 1y, 10% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $75,926 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarthcorps — $75,702 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSave The Bay — $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $74,932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC — $69,574 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Orange County Coastkeeper
  • Who funds California Ocean Science Trust
  • Who funds San Diego Bird Alliance
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Earthcorps
  • Who funds Save The Bay
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Honda Marine Science Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honda Marine Science Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Honda Marine Science Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph