Loading…
· Public charity
HOMESIGHT
Promoting social and economic equity to preserve and enhance economically and culturally diverse communities through affordable homeownership, business development, and community advocacy.
$698k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants
1
Communities
$279k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Human Services$1.2MEducation$931kArts & Culture$289kCommunity Improvement$103kEnvironment$90kOther$14k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
seedsoutheast seattle
2020
northwest filmfilm forummediaartistready
2021
rainier beachnorthwest filmfilm forumtransferactionmediaartist
2022
readyimmigrants refugeeshousing
2023
readyeducationhousingimmigrants refugees
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $50k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $345k
- $250k+1 grant · $279k
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LITERACY SOURCE$278,930
- ASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE$190,000
- FRONT AND CENTERED$90,000
- NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$65,393
- SOMALI COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SEA$49,990
- LEWIS MILLER LLC DBA COMFORT ZONE$8,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 5 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
4
Total granted
$2.5M
$118k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+93%
+145%
Still filing today
100%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLITERARY SOURCE4× · 2020–2023 · $931k · revenue +133%
- ACASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE4× · 2020–2023 · $805k · revenue +93%
- NFNORTHWEST FILM INSTITUTE2× · 2020–2021 · $289k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- RBRAINIER BEACH ACTION COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $93k · revenue +145%
- SESOUTHEAST EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENTgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +325%
- KKANDELIAgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Southwest Washington Equity Coalition
The Southwest Washington Equity Coalition advances racial equity through dismantling structural white supremacy, creating transformational action, and advocating for our community. We remain rooted in Re-Indigenization, Black Liberation,…
Civil Rights
2
Somali Empowerment Circle
Sec provides culturally sensitive mental health resources, connects clients to professionals, offers education, emotional support, promotes maternal health, early childhold outcomes, and advocates for housing security for somali…
Community Improvement
3
Re Sources
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
Environment
4
The Alliance for Pioneer Square
Neighborhood revitalization and community economic development within the Pioneer Square district of Seattle
Community Improvement
5
Pierce County Center for
Our mission is to resolve differences and strengthen relationships in the community with inclusive and equitable dialog.
Crime & Legal
6
House Our Neighbors
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
—
7
Economic Opportunity Institute
EOI works to make Washington state a national model of economic opportunity with an economy that truly works for everyone.
Community Improvement
8
Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition - Tag
Elevate the voice of those impacted by the Duwamish River pollution and other environmental injustices for a clean, healthy, equitable environment for people and wildlife. We promote place-keeping and prioritize communit
Environment
9
Friends of Seattle Waterfront
To support, through outreach, fundraising and stewardship, the City's Waterfront Seattle project: Creation of a park along the central shoreline to benefit the public
Community Improvement
10
King County Sexual Assault Resource
Non-profit organization providing sexual assault related services for people of King County.
—
11
Washington Food Coalition
To strengthen hunger relief providers in Washington State
—
12
Unitedly
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Counseling and Referral Service and the most unlike its peers is Somali Community Services of Seattle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$1,247,419Education$931,433Arts & Culture$288,758Community Improvement$102,992Environment$90,000Other$14,080
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LITERARY SOURCE ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SOMALI COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SEA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds RAINIER BEACH ACTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds FRONT AND CENTERED ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds KANDELIA ↗
- Who funds RAINIER CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Seattle FoundationWA23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Gates Foundation · Homesight Community Development · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Medina Foundation · United Way of King County · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation HOMESIGHT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LITERARY SOURCE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 912101208 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LITERARY SOURCE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Homesight?
Find your warmest path to Homesight through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines