Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hollerbachs Has Heart

$28k
Granted FY2023
64
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Employment$34kAnimals$5kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$350
Median grant
2
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SORBA$917
Oviedo High School Wrestling Team$760
Florida Bat Conservancy$700
Seminole County 4H Knight Riders$660
Meals on Wheels etc Seminole County$630
Individual grant recipient$600
Individual grant recipient$595
Fusion Dance Millennium Middle$580
Spay N Save$550
Pack 242 BSA$530
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Kairos Adventures: $490 → 13%Kairos Adventures: $430 → 11%Hearts Hands and Hope: $271 → 11%Helpful Hands: $525 → 11%Christmas Dreams: $475 → 11%Christmas Dreams: $472 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10k · 10 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
82

Total granted

$10k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+17%

Still filing today

40%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Oviedo High School Wrestling Team
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2023 · $2k
  • AR
    AVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lamp of Hope Ministry Inc

Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…

Human Services
2
Saved 2 Serve Inc

Our mission statement is to partner with ordinary people to go and do extraordinary things in the name of Jesus so that all might see, hear and experience Gods love in tangible ways. We spread hope and the love of God to North Floridas…

Human Services
3
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
4
Tampa Homeless Outreach Inc

To identify, locate, and aid homeless individuals-specifically veterans-by providing emergency assistance, necessities, and housing resources

Human Services
5
Central Florida Haven of Hope Ministries Inc

Benevolence and food support for those in the community who are food insecure.

Health
6
Hollys Hope of North Port
Education
7
South Florida Beagle Rescue Inc

beagle rescue

Animals
8
Sowing Seeds Outreach Inc

Homless clothing and

Human Services
9
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
10
Second Chance of Northwest Florida Inc

To restore hope and dignity and affect positively the quality of life for brain injury survivors and their families, minimizing the effects and enabling each to function at the highest level possible, both in the community and in their…

Health
11
Hungers End Inc

Ending Hunger Providing Hope through our Food Pantry programs and services provided.

Food & Nutrition
12
Tears

Shelter and care for homeless animals

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels Etc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Warriors On the Water Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · Other+125 more — $63,180 · Other+125 moreCHRISTMAS DREAMS INCORPORATED — $947 · Human ServicesKairos Adventures Inc — $920 · Human ServicesHELPFUL HANDS INC — $525 · Human ServicesHEARTS HANDS & HOPE INC — $271 · Human ServicesBRITTS BUNCH — $210 · Human ServicesAVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER — $1,411 · AnimalsSPAY N SAVE INC — $890 · AnimalsNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $490 · HealthWARRIORS ON THE WATER INC — $390 · HealthMEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC — $687 · Food & NutritionRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $660 · Housing & ShelterLADIES 327 INC — $560 · PhilanthropyBikers Against Trafficking Inc — $235 · Crime & Legal
Other$66,180Human Services$2,873Animals$2,301Health$880Food & Nutrition$687Housing & Shelter$660Philanthropy$560Crime & Legal$235

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER — $1,411 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKairos Adventures Inc — $920 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPAY N SAVE INC — $890 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC — $687 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE FAMILIES INC — $607 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADIES 327 INC — $560 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPFUL HANDS INC — $525 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIORS ON THE WATER INC — $390 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEARTS HANDS & HOPE INC — $271 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBikers Against Trafficking Inc — $235 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $214 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITTS BUNCH — $210 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSanford Chamber of Commerce Inc — $178 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS DREAMS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Kairos Adventures Inc
  • Who funds SPAY N SAVE INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC
  • Who funds RESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds EMBRACE FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds LADIES 327 INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hollerbachs Has Heart funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
  • Meals On Wheels Etc Inc18% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hollerbachs Has Heart?

Find your warmest path to Hollerbachs Has Heart through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph