Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hollerbachs Has Heart

$28k
Granted FY2023
64
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Employment$34kAnimals$5kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$350
Median grant
2
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SORBA$917
Oviedo High School Wrestling Team$760
Florida Bat Conservancy$700
Seminole County 4H Knight Riders$660
Meals on Wheels etc Seminole County$630
Individual grant recipient$600
Individual grant recipient$595
Fusion Dance Millennium Middle$580
Spay N Save$550
Pack 242 BSA$530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Kairos Adventures: $490 → 13%Kairos Adventures: $430 → 11%Hearts Hands and Hope: $271 → 11%Helpful Hands: $525 → 11%Christmas Dreams: $475 → 11%Christmas Dreams: $472 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 10 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
82

Total granted

$10k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
0%

Still filing today

40%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Oviedo High School Wrestling Team
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2023 · $2k
  • AR
    AVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lamp of Hope Ministry Inc

Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…

Human Services
2
Saved 2 Serve Inc

Our mission statement is to partner with ordinary people to go and do extraordinary things in the name of Jesus so that all might see, hear and experience Gods love in tangible ways. We spread hope and the love of God to North Floridas…

Human Services
3
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
4
Tampa Homeless Outreach Inc

To identify, locate, and aid homeless individuals-specifically veterans-by providing emergency assistance, necessities, and housing resources

Human Services
5
Central Florida Haven of Hope Ministries Inc

Benevolence and food support for those in the community who are food insecure.

Health
6
Hollys Hope of North Port
Education
7
South Florida Beagle Rescue Inc

beagle rescue

Animals
8
Sowing Seeds Outreach Inc

Homless clothing and

Human Services
9
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
10
Second Chance of Northwest Florida Inc

To restore hope and dignity and affect positively the quality of life for brain injury survivors and their families, minimizing the effects and enabling each to function at the highest level possible, both in the community and in their…

Health
11
Hungers End Inc

Ending Hunger Providing Hope through our Food Pantry programs and services provided.

Food & Nutrition
12
Tears

Shelter and care for homeless animals

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels Etc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warriors On the Water Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other+125 more: $63,180 · Other+125 moreCHRISTMAS DREAMS INCORPORATED: $947 · Human ServicesKairos Adventures Inc: $920 · Human ServicesHELPFUL HANDS INC: $525 · Human ServicesHEARTS HANDS & HOPE INC: $271 · Human ServicesBRITTS BUNCH: $210 · Human ServicesAVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER: $1,411 · AnimalsSPAY N SAVE INC: $890 · AnimalsNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $490 · HealthWARRIORS ON THE WATER INC: $390 · HealthMEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC: $687 · Food & NutritionRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $660 · Housing & ShelterLADIES 327 INC: $560 · PhilanthropyBikers Against Trafficking Inc: $235 · Crime & Legal
Other$66,180Human Services$2,873Animals$2,301Health$880Food & Nutrition$687Housing & Shelter$660Philanthropy$560Crime & Legal$235

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER: $1,411 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKairos Adventures Inc: $920 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPAY N SAVE INC: $890 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC: $687 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE FAMILIES INC: $607 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADIES 327 INC: $560 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPFUL HANDS INC: $525 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIORS ON THE WATER INC: $390 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEARTS HANDS & HOPE INC: $271 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBikers Against Trafficking Inc: $235 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $214 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITTS BUNCH: $210 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSanford Chamber of Commerce Inc: $178 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVIAN RECONDITIONING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS DREAMS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Kairos Adventures Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPAY N SAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ETC INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACE FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LADIES 327 INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hollerbachs Has Heart funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hollerbachs Has Heart. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Meals On Wheels Etc Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hollerbachs Has Heart?

Find your warmest path to Hollerbachs Has Heart through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hollerbachs Has Heart’s filings →

More from the funding graph