· Private foundation
Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of HOLLEMAN ROY & MARIAN FDN-MAIN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k10 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| CITY OF CHULA VISTA | $29,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA LABRADORS RETRIEVERS AND MORE | $20,000 |
| SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA | $20,000 |
| SHELTER TO SOLDIER INC | $15,000 |
| RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS | $11,000 |
| FREEDOM DOGS | $10,000 |
| CITY OF DEL MAR | $10,000 |
| DOGS ON DEPLOYMENT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO6× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +42%
- RCRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +89%
- SDSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- OLOUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +316%
- FFFROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +59%
- SSPCAone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…
SPOT Saving Pets One at a Time is a leading San Diego County all-volunteer rescue organization whose main focus is to save dogs and cats in shelters who are at risk of euthanization and to help other dogs and cats in need as well. In…
Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Rescuing medium to large breed dogs and puppies from high kill shelters and unsafe conditions. We give each animal proper vet care, vaccinations, rehabilitation, microchipping and basic training to secure their future in a Furever home.
We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…
To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.
foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs
Love Dogs wants to end the killing of homeless dogs through adoption and free or low-cost spay and neuter. We use the creativity and problem solving skills of Silicon Valley to save the lives of as many dogs as possible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Little Brothers and Sisters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
- Who funds California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue ↗
- Who funds VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds OUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Dogs on Deployment ↗
- Who funds HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER TO SOLDIER INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM DOGS ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds A PASSION FOR PAWS RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds LAUGHING PONY RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Animal Pad ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Kerr Family Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Billingsley Foundationcharle & Ruth · Masserini Maurice J Tua · David C Copley Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The San Diego Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.