Skip to content
Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main at a glance

· Private foundation

Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$572kPublic Benefit$240kEducation$235kInternational$50kHealth$20kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$50,000
CITY OF CHULA VISTA$29,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$25,000
CALIFORNIA LABRADORS RETRIEVERS AND MORE$20,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA$20,000
SHELTER TO SOLDIER INC$15,000
RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS$11,000
CITY OF DEL MAR$10,000
DOGS ON DEPLOYMENT$10,000
FREEDOM DOGS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $25k → 11%FREEDOM DOGS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$966k · 14 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$966k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+77%

Still filing today

79%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationScience & TechHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +42%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +48%
  • RC
    RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +316%
  • FF
    FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +59%
  • AP
    A PASSION FOR PAWS RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +620%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazing Dogs

Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…

Animals
2
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Spot

SPOT Saving Pets One at a Time is a leading San Diego County all-volunteer rescue organization whose main focus is to save dogs and cats in shelters who are at risk of euthanization and to help other dogs and cats in need as well. In…

Animals
5
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
6
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
7
Sunshine Dog Rescue Inc

Rescuing medium to large breed dogs and puppies from high kill shelters and unsafe conditions. We give each animal proper vet care, vaccinations, rehabilitation, microchipping and basic training to secure their future in a Furever home.

Animals
8
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
9
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
10
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
11
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
12
Love Dogs Rescue and Foundation Incorporated

Love Dogs wants to end the killing of homeless dogs through adoption and free or low-cost spay and neuter. We use the creativity and problem solving skills of Silicon Valley to save the lives of as many dogs as possible.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Our Little Brothers and Sisters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $210,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOCITY OF CHULA VISTA: $188,020 · OtherCITY OF CHULA VISTACITY OF DEL MAR: $52,000 · OtherCITY OF DEL MAROUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC: $50,000 · OtherOUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INCSAVE-A-LIFE PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $95,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCARANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $95,000 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETYCalifornia Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue: $85,000 · AnimalsCalifornia Labradors Retrievers & More RescueVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS: $51,000 · AnimalsVOICE FOR THE ANIMALSHELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · AnimalsHELPING PAWS FOUNDATIONDogs on Deployment: $30,000 · AnimalsDogs on DeploymentSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $30,000 · AnimalsSHELTER TO SOLDIER INCSPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT: $20,000 · Animals+4 more: $45,500 · Animals+4 moreFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION: $35,000 · Science & TechCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM DOGS: $10,000 · Human ServicesOklahoma State University Foundation: $24,855 · EducationLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $10,000 · Health
Other$540,020Animals$481,500Science & Tech$35,000Human Services$35,000Education$24,855Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $210,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $95,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCalifornia Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue: $85,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS: $51,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetOUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetDogs on Deployment: $30,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $24,855 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFREEDOM DOGS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAnimal Pad: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationKerr Family FoundationThornton S Jr and Kat…Jewish Community Foun…Ethel Frends Charitab…Rancho Santa Fe Found…Billingsley Foundatio…Masserini Maurice J T…David C Copley Founda…Greater Good CharitiesThe San Diego Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…
Sempra FoundationCA22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Kerr Family Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Billingsley Foundationcharle & Ruth · Masserini Maurice J Tua · David C Copley Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The San Diego Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holleman Roy & Marian Fdn-Main’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home