· Private foundation
Holder Family Foundation Holder Family Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of Holder Family Foundation Holder Family Trust’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VIPASSANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| HAWAII VIPASSANA ASSOC | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| THE LEARNING COUNCIL | $1,000 |
| PARIYATTI | $1,000 |
| MID DEL TECH CENTER | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| THE NATURE CONNECTION | $500 |
| ELEVATE HER | $500 |
| COMMUNITY OPTIONS OF MONTROSE | $500 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA | $500 |
| KVNF | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| CITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY COMMUNITY | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPARIYATTI5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +8%
- ADAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +84%
- FIFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- IVIDAHO VAPASSANA CENTERone grant, 2023 · $11k
- VFVIPASSANA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
- VVIPASSANAone grant, 2020 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
Advance the well- being of mountain people and conservation of mountain environments.
Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.
Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico
We apply principles of ecology to ensure that our innovative programs integrate advances in scientific and economic understanding to ensure the viability of coastal forests and the livelihoods of the people who live in them.
The Friends of the Inyos mission is to protect, and care for, the lands and waters of Californias Eastern Sierra.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Para works to protect the patagonia mountains and sonoita creek watershed from negative impacts of industrialized mining by: 1. holding state and federal agencies accountable for environmental laws and regulations; 2. collaborating with…
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
Within the Americas promoting dialogue and research, producing studies and reports, conducting courses and conferences particularly in the areas of agroecology and food security
The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Diversity Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Vipassana Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PARIYATTI ↗
- Who funds Hawaii Vipassana Association ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE IN POLITICS ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
- Who funds Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Patagonia Regional Times Inc ↗
- Who funds SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Family Diversity Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds elevateHER ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Westport Fund · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Colorado Gives Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Arizona Community Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Holder Family Foundation Holder Family Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.