Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hoffman & McNamara Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$114kPhilanthropy$45kHuman Services$28kReligion$26kEnvironment$18kAnimals$15kHealth$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$788k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PHEASANTS FOREVER$4,246
HASTINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT$3,000
CITY OF HOPE$2,800
UNITED WAY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,400
Individual grant recipient$2,350
Individual grant recipient$2,200
CARLSON SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$2,000
CARPENTER NATURE CENTER$1,800
HASTINGS FAMILY SERVICE$1,721
OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,200
MN NURSERY & LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION$1,000
CITY OF HASTINGS$447
ST ELIZABETH SETON CHURCH$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $506) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CORRIE'S HOUSE: $100 → 6%CORRIE'S HOUSE: $100 → 6%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $100 → 14%CRESCENT COVE: $206 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 36 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
38

Total granted

$225k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+6%

Still filing today

6%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k
  • CN
    CARPENTER NATURE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • KC
    KINGS CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • EU
    ESTERO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Assumption Home Inc

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
2
Benedictine Living Communities - Bismarck Inc Dba St Gabriels Community

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
3
Trinity Health & Affiliates

Trinity health is committed to preserving and improving the quality of health of the people we serve. our mission is to excel at meeting the needs of the whole person through the provision of quality health care and health related services.

Health
4
Benedictine Living Community of St Peter

Benedictine living community - st. peter is a catholic organization entrusted with advancing the health care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. our mission is to witness to god's love by providing compassionate,…

—
5
Benedictine Senior Living Community of St Peter Dba Benedictine Court

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
6
Benedictine Living Community - Owatonna

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
7
Benedictine Care Centers

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating compassionate communities providing support…

Health
8
Benedictine Living Communities Inc

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
9
City of Lakes Care Center D/B/a Benedictine Health Center of Mpls

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Health
10
Bridges Care Center

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Housing & Shelter
11
Assumption Community Services Inc

We provide our residents with a dynamic continuum of care encompassing the social, spiritual, physical and mental aspects of the individual, steepen in the benedictine values of hospitality, stewardship, respect and jusstice. our vision is…

Human Services
12
Catholic Residential Services Inc Dba Benedictine Living Communities of Wi

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Benedictine Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hastings Area Chamber of Commerce and Tourism Bureau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $15,480 · OtherCITY OF HOPEUNITED WAY: $14,950 · OtherUNITED WAYCARPENTER NATURE CENTER: $14,900 · OtherCARPENTER NATURE CENTERCARLSON SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $14,800 · OtherCARLSON SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTPHEASANTS FOREVER: $14,409 · OtherPHEASANTS FOREVERPROJECT SHAREFAMILY SERVICE: $14,231 · OtherPROJECT SHAREFAMILY SERVICEOUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12,900 · OtherYMCA: $11,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,800 · OtherMN NURSERY & LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · Other+57 more: $96,500 · Other+57 moreNorthfield Hospital Foundation: $300 · HealthNEVER SURRENDER INC: $200 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $150 · HealthCRESCENT COVE: $206 · Human ServicesCORRIE'S HOUSE: $200 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $100 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $300 · Housing & ShelterTHE FALLEN OUTDOORS: $300 · Recreation & SportsWORLD VISION INC: $200 · InternationalDucks Unlimited Inc: $200 · Environment
Other$253,720Health$650Human Services$506Housing & Shelter$300Recreation & Sports$300International$200Environment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGINA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHASTINGS FAMILY SERVICE: $1,721 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEDICTINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FALLEN OUTDOORS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND TOURISM BUREAU: $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORRIE'S HOUSE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVER SURRENDER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGINA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hoffman & McNamara Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hoffman & McNamara Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hoffman & McNamara Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hoffman & McNamara Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hoffman & McNamara’s filings →

    More from the funding graph