Skip to content

· Private foundation

HJM Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$313kReligion$119kHealth$79kArts & Culture$69kEducation$25kRecreation & Sports$15kInternational$10kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation of Greater Los An$101,800
USC Hillel Foundation$12,000
Sinai Temple$11,100
JQ International$10,000
LAJ Health$10,000
Hillel at UCLA$7,500
Judaism Alive$7,200
Cedars Sinai Women's Guild$5,300
JDC$5,000
Birthright Israel Foundation$5,000
HMLA$5,000
At the Well$5,000
The Schechter Institutes Inc$5,000
Cayton Children's Museum$5,000
Children's Hospital Los Angeles$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Vista Del Mar: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$593k · 23 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$593k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+3%

Still filing today

74%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JQ INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • JA
    JUDAISM ALIVE DBA JEWISH ROCK RADIO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +2%
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CF
    CONCERN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +42%
  • MA
    Make A Wish Greater Los Angeles
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • JC
    Jewish Creativity International
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
2
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
3
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
4
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
6
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
7
Partners in Torah

Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…

Religion
8
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
9
Yeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles

The Organization is a school dedicated to providing an outstanding Judaic and general education in an environment that is consistent with this ideology. The Organization seeks to fulfill its mission by hiring the finest teachers and staff…

Education
10
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
11
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
12
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish Federation of Greater Los An: $302,800 · OtherJewish Federation of Greater Los AnUSC Hillel Foundation: $33,500 · OtherUSC Hillel FoundationSinai Temple: $24,000 · Other+27 more: $126,094 · Other+27 moreSHAREWELL: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $300 · Arts & CultureJQ INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 · ReligionBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $2,500 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $12,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $11,000 · HealthPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $6,900 · HealthRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $2,500 · HealthOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER: $2,200 · Health+2 more: $1,500 · HealthJUDAISM ALIVE DBA JEWISH ROCK RADIO: $21,600 · EducationYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $9,500 · InternationalTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $6,800 · PhilanthropyCONCERN FOUNDATION: $2,250 · Philanthropy
Other$486,394Arts & Culture$40,300Religion$38,500Health$36,600Education$23,100International$9,500Philanthropy$9,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHAREWELL: $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJQ INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetJUDAISM ALIVE DBA JEWISH ROCK RADIO: $21,600 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAT THE WELL PROJECT INC: $9,300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $6,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $6,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $5,434 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONETABLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDetermined to Succeed: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJVS SOCAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert FoundationCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Lynn & Les Bider Family Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Jewish Communal Fund · The Erwin Rautenberg Foundation · The Cayton-Goldrich Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization HJM Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from HJM Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on HJM Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph