Skip to content
HJH Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

HJH Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MEducation$405kRecreation & Sports$194kPhilanthropy$95kInternational$5k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$806k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Foundation For Hope$30,000
Impact Church Forest$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BARCC$9,257
Push The Rock$6,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$5,000
TLM Foundation$5,000
ACTS$4,000
CRU$2,000
International Mission Board$2,000
Allow The Children$2,000
Timberlake Christian School$1,500
Salvation Army$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Evangelical Free Church of America: $3k → 11%Push The Rock: $6k → 11%Z78 Ministries Deer Creek Camp: $50k → 12%Greater Orlando Church: $12k → 13%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $8k → 15%Awana: $10k → 14%Global Wellness Ministries: $5k → 12%Impact Church Forest: $300k → 8%Timberlake Baptist Church: $132k → 20%Dwelling Place Christian Fellowship: $3k → 21%Evangelical Free Church of America: $3k → 11%Z78 Ministries: $50k → 12%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $5k → 15%Impact Church Forest: $229k → 8%Liberty University: $100k → 20%Z78 Ministries: $40k → 12%Timberlake Christian School: $50k → 8%BARCC: $9k → 13%Calvary Chapel Lynchburg: $100k → 20%Z78 Ministries: $25k → 12%Timberlake Christian School: $45k → 8%The Flames Way: $80k → 20%Deer Creek Camp: $10k → 12%Impact Church Forest: $40k → 8%Liberty University: $75k → 20%Impact Church Forest: $25k → 8%Liberty University: $55k → 20%Impact Church Forest: $20k → 8%Liberty University: $50k → 20%Impact Church Forest: $15k → 8%Liberty University: $42k → 20%Timberlake Christian School: $13k → 8%The Flames Way: $40k → 20%Impact Church Forest: $11k → 8%Liberty University: $40k → 20%Impact Church Forest: $10k → 8%Liberty University: $33k → 20%Allow The Children: $6k → 8%Liberty University: $10k → 20%TLM Foundation: $5k → 8%ACTS: $9k → 20%TLM Foundation: $5k → 8%ACTS: $4k → 20%Foundation For Hope: $30k → 8%Foundation For Hope: $30k → 8%Foundation For Hope: $20k → 8%Foundation For Hope: $5k → 8%Acts of Himalaya: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
PA
NJ
MO
VA
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 20 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$1.7M
$263k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+24%

Still filing today

45%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $405k · revenue +75%
  • ZM
    Z78 MINISTRIES DBA DEER CREEK CAMP
    4× · 2021–2024 · $165k · revenue +238%
  • FF
    Foundation For Hope
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +8% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • TB
    Timberlake Baptist Church
    one grant, 2018 · $132k
  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL OF LYNCHBURG
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • GO
    Greater Orlando Church
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
2
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
3
A2 Ministries International Ltd
Religion
4
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
5
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
6
Christ to the World Ministries Inc

Proclaim and share the Gospel of Christ in unique ways throughout Asia to reach Christians and non-Christians.

Religion
7
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
8
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
11
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
12
Tim Case International Ministries Inc
International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Push the Rock; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPACT CHURCH-FOREST INC: $649,500 · OtherIMPACT CHURCH-FOREST INCTimberlake Baptist Church: $132,000 · OtherTimberlake Baptist ChurchTimberlake Christian School: $108,750 · OtherTimberlake Christian SchoolCALVARY CHAPEL OF LYNCHBURG: $100,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL OF LYNCHBURG+18 more: $114,957 · Other+18 moreLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $404,500 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INCZ78 MINISTRIES DBA DEER CREEK CAMP: $165,000 · Recreation & SportsZ78 MINIST…PUSH THE ROCK: $11,200 · Recreation & SportsPUSH THE R…FLAMES WAY INC: $120,000 · Public BenefitFoundation For Hope: $85,000 · PhilanthropyALLOW THE CHILDREN INC: $12,740 · ReligionAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $10,600 · ReligionACTS OF HIMALAYA INC: $4,100 · ReligionWorld Help: $3,000 · ReligionHOPE OUT LOUD: $2,000 · ReligionMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $1,500 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentGLEANING FOR THE WORLD INC: $104 · International
Other$1,105,207Education$404,500Recreation & Sports$176,200Public Benefit$120,000Philanthropy$85,000Religion$33,940Youth Development$12,500International$104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $404,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetZ78 MINISTRIES DBA DEER CREEK CAMP: $165,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetFLAMES WAY INC: $120,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetFoundation For Hope: $85,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetALLOW THE CHILDREN INC: $12,740 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUSH THE ROCK: $11,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $10,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTLM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetACTS OF HIMALAYA INC: $4,100 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWorld Help: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE OUT LOUD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANING FOR THE WORLD INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Z78 MINISTRIES DBA DEER CREEK CAMP ↗
  • Who funds FLAMES WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation For Hope ↗
  • Who funds ALLOW THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds PUSH THE ROCK ↗
  • Who funds AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds TLM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS OF HIMALAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds World Help ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OUT LOUD ↗
  • Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds GLEANING FOR THE WORLD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Foster FoundationServant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Foster Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization HJH Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from HJH Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to HJH Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to HJH Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on HJH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home