Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hirt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$48kHousing & Shelter$43kReligion$42kHuman Services$38kPhilanthropy$33kRecreation & Sports$29kEnvironment$25kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENISON UNIVERSITY$25,000
SYCAMORE LAND TRUST$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY$10,000
NEW HOPE FOR FAMILIES$5,000
YMCA OF MICHIANA CAMP EBERHART$5,000
OWEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
USA INTERNATIONAL HARP COMPETITION$1,000
RAILS TO TRAILS$1,000
PALS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNBOUND: $980 → 16%UBOUND: $500 → 16%UNBOUND: $480 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 13 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$165k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+19%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +563%
  • SL
    SYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED
    4× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +54%
  • OC
    OWEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +184%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • YC
    YMCA CAMP EBERHART AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
5
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
9
Franklin College of Indiana

Franklin College empowers students through an experiential education, grounded in the liberal arts and sciences, promoting impactful careers and meaningful lives.

Education
10
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
11
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Owen County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMERCY CONSULTATION CENTER OF DALLAS: $20,000 · OtherMERCY CONSULTATION CENTER OF DALLASST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIMON BRUTE COLLEGE SEMINARY: $10,000 · OtherSIMON BRUTE COLLEGE SEMINARYST MARY'S COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherST MARY'S COLLEGEYMCA CAMP EBERHART AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherYMCA CAMP EBERHART AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCH: $6,000 · Other+16 more: $35,153 · Other+16 moreNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $58,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW HOPE FAMILY SH…DENISON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVE…CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · EducationCAMP EBERHART…Indiana University Foundation: $5,000 · EducationIndiana Unive…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…SYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $24,500 · EnvironmentOWEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 · AnimalsBrown County Humane Society Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionUnbound: $1,960 · Human Services
Other$178,153Housing & Shelter$58,000Education$41,000Philanthropy$30,000Environment$24,500Animals$11,500Food & Nutrition$2,000Human Services$1,960

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $58,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $24,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMERCY CONSULTATION CENTER OF DALLAS: $20,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetOWEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrown County Humane Society Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnbound: $1,960 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetU S A INTERNATIONAL HARP COMPETITION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CONSULTATION CENTER OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OWEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Brown County Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds U S A INTERNATIONAL HARP COMPETITION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Smithville Charitable Foundation IncIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hirt Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hirt Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hirt Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hirt Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hirt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph