Skip to content

· Public charity

Hillsborough County Bar Foundation

The foundation is operated for charitable,scientific and educatioanl purposes.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$476kHuman Services$364kReligion$28k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY$20,000
CORSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS$20,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$20,000
BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC$15,000
WFCTA - JUSTICE RESTORATION CENTER$12,500
ST MICHAEL'S LEGAL FOR WOMEN & CHI$12,500
GIFT OF ADOPTION - FLORIDA CHAPTER$10,000
HEART GALLERY OF TAMPA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEART GALLERY OF TAMPA: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$795k · 9 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$795k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+185%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +76%
  • TS
    THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +94%
  • CF
    CROSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +730% · 62% of their budget

Funded once

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN OF TAMPA BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +185%
  • GO
    GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +132%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Childrens Rights Coalition

Legal representation of children.

Community Improvement
2
Adoption Authority Inc

Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.

—
3
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
4
Court Appointed Special Advocate Guardian Ad Litem of Miami Co Inc

To provide dedicated volunteers to advocate in court for the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect.

Human Services
5
Child Advocacy Center Inc

A comprehensive, child-friendly facility where professionals from law enforcement, medical, child protection and therapeutic services collaborate to meet the individual needs of child victims and break the cycle of abuse.

Crime & Legal
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—
8
Voices of the Abused

Help and heal the heartacheand pain of the abused.

Crime & Legal
9
Voices for Children Foundation Inc

To represent the best interests of children involved in civil proceedings due to abuse and/or neglect. court appointed special advocate associations support and promote court-appointed volunteer advocacy for abused and neglected children…

Crime & Legal
10
Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc
Health
11
Forever Homes for Foster Kids

helping kids find their parents or legal custodians

Food & Nutrition
12
Justice for Children Inc

Advocacy for victims of child abuse

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices for Children of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Are You Safe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $145,350 · OtherBAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INCTHE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC: $135,350 · OtherTHE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INCGIFT OF ADOPTION - FLORIDA CHAPTER: $67,850 · OtherGIFT OF ADOPTION - FLORIDA CHAPTERWFCTA - JUSTICE RESTORATION CENTER: $60,350 · OtherWFCTA - JUSTICE RESTORATION CENTERAre You Safe Inc: $57,850 · OtherAre You Safe IncST MICHAEL'S LEGAL FOR WOMEN & CHI: $52,500 · OtherST MICHAEL'S LEGAL FOR WOMEN & CHIMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $27,605 · OtherVOICES FOR CHILDREN OF TAMPA BAY INC: $20,000 · OtherCROSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS INC: $135,350 · Crime & LegalCROSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS INCVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $115,350 · Crime & LegalVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices fo…WEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalWEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING …GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHeart Gallery of Tampa Inc: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$566,855Crime & Legal$275,700Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $145,350 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC: $135,350 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS INC: $135,350 over 7y, 62% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $115,350 over 6y, 95% of budgetAre You Safe Inc: $57,850 over 5y, 84% of budgetWEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN OF TAMPA BAY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetGIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHeart Gallery of Tampa Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FOR FLORIDA KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Voice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida ↗
  • Who funds Are You Safe Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Heart Gallery of Tampa Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hillsborough County Bar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hillsborough County Bar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Bay Area Legal Services Inc: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hillsborough County Bar’s filings →

More from the funding graph