· Private foundation
Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PA | $2,500 |
| PAXTON MINISTRIES | $2,400 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $2,400 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $2,400 |
| DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD | $2,000 |
| LEG UP FARM | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PSPAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +83%
- VRVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +46%
- LULEG UP FARM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- BHBRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +7%
- HHHOLDING HOPEone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -64%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's purpose is to provide emotional and financial support to local patients and their families whose lives have been burdened by cancer.
To engage christian faith communities in ending family homelessness through neighboring relationships that demonstrate christ's love.
Provides assistance to single mothers with dependent children experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness in bucks and montgomery counties in pennsylvania.
To promote self-determination and control in housing choices for people with disabilities in the commonwealth of pennsylvania.
York habitat for humanity is a faith-based housing ministry providing safe, decent, affordable homeownership to low income families in york county, pennsylvania living in substandard housing.
Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
Chartiers believes each individual, regardless of economic status, has a right to achieve his/her highest potential and become a self-sufficient and full participating member of the community.
Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.
Hands is the largest non-profit provider of high quality affordable housing in northwestern pennsylvania and currently oversees 1,092 apartment homes in over 43 housing communities in 5 counties. for over 50 years, hands has successfully…
Shelter for battered women and children
Dignity Housing's mission is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that confronts low-income families and individuals in the City of Philadelphia.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · Community Aid Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw’s filings →