Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New York · Private foundation

Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,400
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,500
Organizations funded a year
5 to 8
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$257k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$14k0%
FY20247$14k0%
FY20238$15k25%
FY20225$17k0%
FY20215$15k0%
FY20207$15k0%
FY20197$16k14%
FY20187$16k14%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$43kHealth$39kHuman Services$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Paxton Street Home Benevolent Society$24,42180%
Vision Resources of Central Pennsylvania$19,37590%
Leg Up Farm Inc$17,81890%
Bridge of Hope Inc$16,30860%
Downtown Daily Bread$16,22980%
Project Share of Carlisle$5,28930%
Brethren Housing Association$2,30010%
Holding Hope$2,20012%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($32k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaxton Street Home Benevolent Society: $24,421 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVision Resources of Central Pennsylvania: $19,375 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLeg Up Farm Inc: $17,818 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBridge of Hope Inc: $16,308 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDowntown Daily Bread: $16,229 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetProject Share of Carlisle: $5,289 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBrethren Housing Association: $2,300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHolding Hope: $2,200 over 1y, 1.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for En…McCormick Family Fdn …Alexander and Jane Bo…Community Aid IncUnited Way of the Cap…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · Community Aid Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw with peer funders

About Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw

How much does Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw give?
Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw reported 6 grants totaling $13,700 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 8 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (32%), Health (29%), Human Services (22%).
Who are Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Paxton Street Home Benevolent Society ($24k), Vision Resources of Central Pennsylvania ($19k), Leg Up Farm Inc ($18k).
Does Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Foundation for Enhancing Communities, McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397, Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation.
Where is Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw based?
Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hilliard a Hasenkamp Tw’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home