Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.0MFood & Nutrition$595kHuman Services$465kYouth Development$425kEmployment$300kPhilanthropy$200kCivil Rights$115kArts & Culture$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Roots Housing$150,000
Vashon Maury Community Food Bank$125,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Low Income Housing Institute$100,000
DESC$100,000
Food Lifeline$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Farestart$75,000
Plymouth Housing$50,000
Treehouse$50,000
Friends of Youth$50,000
United Way$50,000
YWCA SeattleKingSnohomish$50,000
Community Passageways$50,000
United Indians of All Tribes$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Youthcare: $25k → 9%Youthcare: $25k → 9%AMARA: $15k → 9%Amara: $10k → 9%Amara: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 24 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$4.0M
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+50%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +120%
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +2%
  • T
    TREEHOUSE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • YP
    YWCA PIERCE COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -12%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
2
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
3
Washington Voa Living Center

Low-income housing.

—
4
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
5
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
6
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
7
Compass Family Services

Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.

Human Services
8
Solid Ground Washington

At Solid Ground, we work passionately to end poverty and build a more equitable community. Our services support people experiencing poverty by helping them achieve stability and expand their skills to realize their dreams. And that's just…

Housing & Shelter
9
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
10
Hopelink

Hopelink equips people to exit poverty through comprehensive services, impactful partnerships, and advocacy for equitable opportunities for all.

Human Services
11
Pioneer Human Services Inc

To provide individuals with criminal histories the opportunity to lead healthy, productive lives, and further the fostering of low income housing.

Human Services
12
Friendship Place

Friendship Place is a leader in the Washington, DC, metro area in developing solutions to homelessness that have measurable results and a lasting impact. Friendship Place's mission is to empower people who are experiencing or at risk of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Housing Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Langston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $400,000 · OtherLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTEDESC: $400,000 · OtherDESCCommunity Roots Housing: $300,000 · OtherCommunity Roots HousingUNITED WAY: $200,000 · OtherUNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $150,000 · OtherVASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES: $115,000 · OtherYWCA PIERCE COUNTY: $100,000 · Other+12 more: $435,000 · Other+12 moreFOOD LIFELINE: $400,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFEL…TREEHOUSE: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSECOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY …FARESTART: $300,000 · EmploymentPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterAFRICATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $200,025 · HealthYOUTHCARE: $50,000 · Human ServicesAMARA: $35,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $27,000 · Human Services
Other$2,650,000Food & Nutrition$400,000Youth Development$400,000Employment$300,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Health$200,025Human Services$112,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $400,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART: $300,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $200,025 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS: $200,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetVASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $150,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA PIERCE COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLANGSTON: $50,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetAMARA: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAtlantic Street Center: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds VASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds LANGSTON ↗
  • Who funds AMARA ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic Street Center ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Raikes Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hill Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hill Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hill Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hill Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph