Skip to content
Hildreth Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hildreth Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2019
37
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Hildreth Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Johnson Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Hildreth Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 26 organizations, $57k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

26
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$17kEducation$15kEnvironment$7kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$3kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k35 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELK RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE REGIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY$5,000
MARYHAVEN$3,000
MID-OHIO FOOD BANK$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
LIFECARE ALLIANCE$2,000
RIGHT TREE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COLUMBUS ACADEMY - BOWN SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
CRISTO REY COLUMBUS HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
RESOLVE$1,000
BEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
PILOT DOGS INC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EASTER SEALS CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST OHIO: $250 → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cardinal Land Conservancy

To benefit the general public by preserving natural lands and significant habitats, lands suitable for the production of food, timber, or other cultivated or natural products, lands creating scenic vistas for public enjoyment, lands with…

Environment
2
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
8
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
9
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
10
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Central and Southeast Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grass River Natural Area Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,312,211 · PhilanthropyJOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $10,000 · OtherELK RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherMid-Ohio Foodbank: $2,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $2,500 · Other+24 more: $16,250 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Environment+1 more: $150 · EnvironmentMARYHAVEN INC: $3,000 · HealthRESOLVE Incorporated: $1,000 · HealthLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $250 · Food & NutritionRIGHT TREE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLUMBUS DOG CONNECTION INC: $1,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$1,312,211Other$41,250Environment$6,150Health$4,000Food & Nutrition$2,250Youth Development$2,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,312,211 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYHAVEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI EARLY LEARNING CENTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESOLVE Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS DOG CONNECTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACME CHRISTIAN THRIFT STORE &FOOD PANTRY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASS RIVER NATURAL AREA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COMMUNITY HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColumbus School for Girls: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST OHIO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationUnited Way of Central…Harry C Moores Founda…Grand Traverse Region…Ingram-White Castle F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…McKesson Foundation I…Siebenthaler Foundati…Siemer Family Foundat…The Reinberger Founda…L Brands FoundationColumbus Jewish Found…
Columbus FoundationOH24.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Harry C Moores Foundation · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Siebenthaler Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hildreth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hildreth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hildreth Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hildreth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hildreth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home