Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hickman Leona Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$286kEmployment$35k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$6,269
Median grant
1
States reached
$683k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION$12,539
RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,269
SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN$6,269
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION$6,269
SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION$6,269
LAKE WASHINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE & FDN$6,269
GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN$6,269
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%CENT WASHINGTON UNIV FDN: $5k → 11%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIV: $5k → 12%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $11k → 9%SEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 9%SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN: $6k → 9%GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN: $6k → 9%GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 9%SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FDN: $5k → 9%SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%HIGHLINE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%LAKE WASHINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE & FDN: $6k → 9%LAKE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 9%BELLEVUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$253k · 10 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$253k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+37%

Still filing today

30%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $62k · revenue -24%
  • RT
    RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +386%
  • SC
    SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEATTLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • NS
    NORTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • HC
    HIGHLINE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +115%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle University Foundation

Fundraising activities to support Seattle University

2
South Seattle College Foundation

Our mission is to change lives by providing students with scholarships so they can pursue quality academic and vocational education. we do this through relationship building, fundraising and stewarding resources.

Education
3
Seattle Central College Foundation

To support seattle central students, faculty and programs by raising and providing financial resources to help students achieve their fullest potential through quality education.

4
Foundation for the Seattle Colleges

The Foundation for the Seattle Colleges exists to advance fundraising efforts for the Seattle Community College District. We seek to attract financial resources which support students so they may be successful; maintain the quality and…

5
City University of Seattle

See schedule ofounded in 1973, city university of seattle's mission is to change lives for good by offering high quality and relevant lifelong education to anyone with the desire to learn. city university's vision is to provide underserved…

Education
6
South Puget Sound Community College Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to engage community and build resources to support success for all students.

Education
7
Skagit Valley College Foundation

Secure donations to enhance education at Skagit Valley College through scholarships, grants, and institutional support.

Education
8
Southwestern Community College Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to students of southwestern community college and to provide grants to encourage and promote the academic development and fundamental growth of southwestern community college

9
College Success Foundation

We provide a unique integrated system of supports and scholarships to inspire underserved, low-income students to finish high school, graduate from college and succeed in life.

Education
10
St Cloud State University Foundation Inc

The foundation serves the students, faculty and staff at st. cloud state university by engaging interested alumni and friends in supporting the mission, programs, and goals of the university. st. cloud state university is a highly…

Education
11
Southwestern Oregon Community College Foundation

The purpose of the southwestern oregon community college foundation is to support the college in improving people's lives - socially, culturally, economically and educationally - through friend-raising and fundraising.

12
North Seattle College Education Fund

The Education Fund enriches lives by supporting students, faculty, staff, and programs at North Seattle College.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Colleges Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $24,946 · OtherSHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONHIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION — $24,946 · OtherHIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATIONGREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN — $24,946 · OtherGREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDNLAKE WASHINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE & FDN — $24,946 · OtherLAKE WASHINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE & FDNSOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDN — $24,946 · OtherSOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FDNSHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $10,325 · OtherLAKE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $10,325 · OtherGREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $10,325 · Other+10 more — $53,701 · Other+10 moreSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $61,562 · EducationSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATIONRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $35,271 · EducationRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATIONHIGHLINE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,489 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,927 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $4,927 · Education
Other$209,406Education$112,176

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $61,562 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $35,271 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $24,946 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHIGHLINE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,489 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,927 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $4,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $4,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HIGHLINE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Herbert Jones Foundation · South Seattle College Foundation · Seattle Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hickman Leona Educational Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph