Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hickey Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2021
25
Grants FY2021
9
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Hickey Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Hickey Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $96k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
17
21
18
20
19
14
20
11
21
0
22
1
23
5
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$823kEducation$317kReligion$28kYouth Development$22kHealth$17kRecreation & Sports$17kHousing & Shelter$13kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k22 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$750
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$40,000
MVCC MARY PATRICIA HICKEY SCHOLARSHIP$12,000
JOHNNY MORRIS' WONDERS OF WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$8,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$4,500
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$4,000
BOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA$4,000
ST JOHN OF THE CROSS$3,000
ST MALACHY SCHOOL$1,500
MSCI CENTRAL STATES CHAPTER$1,000
UNITED WAY$1,000
PURE JUSTICE$1,000
MAYO CLINIC$750
TUCSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$500
OLD ST PATRICKS CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%PAWS 4 PEOPLE: $300 → 12%PAWS 4 PEOPLE: $150 → 12%MISERICORDIA HOME: $250 → 14%CLEARBROOK (RILEY RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION FUND): $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$376k · 32 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
41

Total granted

$376k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

63%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    REGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFORD INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +347%
  • CI
    COLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +44%
  • TH
    THE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT
    3× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +242%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +248%
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +37%
  • PT
    PATHWAY TO ADENTURE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
11
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
12
New West Charter School

The mission of new west charter school is to provide an academically rigorous, highly individualized education for 21st century students in grades 6 - 12. in the decades to come, personal success will require increasingly high levels of…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Senior LivingGovernment Accountability R…Youth Development CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…At-Risk Youth MentoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr9%10%35–55yr12%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr15%78%20–35yr9%5%35–55yr12%15%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/102,989

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $656,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more — $900 · PhilanthropyIVERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $164,000 · OtherIVERSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONPMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherPMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONMORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $25,000 · OtherMORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE+61 more — $116,824 · Other+61 moreMORGAN PARK ACADEMY — $75,000 · EducationMORGAN PARK …Big Shoulders Fund — $40,000 · EducationBig Shoulder…REGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFORD INC — $13,400 · EducationREGENTS SCHO…COLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC — $6,900 · Education+4 more — $6,475 · EducationJOHNNY MORRIS' WONDERS OF WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTucson Symphony Society — $2,500 · Arts & CultureArizona Theatre Company — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $450 · Arts & CultureSOUTH CAROLINA CHARITIES INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsCANCER KISS MY COOLEY — $5,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc — $4,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $2,750 · HealthBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $800 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT — $5,550 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterSister Jose Women's Center — $1,500 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S CIRCLE — $800 · Housing & ShelterExodus Community Services Inc — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$656,900Other$405,824Education$141,775Arts & Culture$18,450Recreation & Sports$15,000Health$13,650Housing & Shelter$11,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $656,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMORGAN PARK ACADEMY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHARITIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREGENTS SCHOOL OF OXFORD INC — $13,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRoosevelt University — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAY TO ADVENTURE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNNY MORRIS' WONDERS OF WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC — $6,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT — $5,550 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCANCER KISS MY COOLEY — $5,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Symphony Society — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC — $1,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE WHITE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,025 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPure Justice — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEARBROOK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWELERS FOR CHILDREN — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLa Paloma Family Services Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExodus Community Services Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLuMind IDSC Foundation — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES FIRST FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaring Kitchen Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERRILL ARTS CENTER — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTINA CARINATO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Iverson Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · The Kai Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hickey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hickey Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hickey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph