· Private foundation
Hibler Franke Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $25,000 |
| JAMES BEARD PUBLIC MARKET | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| HILLSBORO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $10,000 |
| PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE | $10,000 |
| BIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON | $10,000 |
| PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| IN A LANDSCAPE | $10,000 |
| OREGON SYMPHONY | $10,000 |
| FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| THE JAPANESE GARDEN FOUNDATION OF OREGON | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WOWaterWatch of Oregon6× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +328%
- NBNORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +152%
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $118k · revenue +182%
Funded once
- 1F1000 FRIENDS OF OREGONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +72%
- FFFLYFISHER FOUNDATION THEone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -63%
- NNNEW NARRATIVEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…
Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.
Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1000 Friends of Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Committee to Protect Journalists Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WaterWatch of Oregon ↗
- Who funds NORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds BIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds IN A LANDSCAPE ↗
- Who funds TUALITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JAPANESE GARDEN FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEAR ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds FLYFISHER FOUNDATION THE ↗
- Who funds NEW NARRATIVE ↗
- Who funds ROSE CITY HOCKEY CLUB ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds READING RESULTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · D27 Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Clark Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hibler Franke Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- WaterWatch of Oregon — 61% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
- New Narrative — 6% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Tuality Healthcare Foundation — 3% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- In a Landscape — 0% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.