· Private foundation
Heyrman Construction Co Inc Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of HEYRMAN CONSTRUCTION CO INC FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST BERNARD CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| GRACE | $47,000 |
| BELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSING | $30,000 |
| ST JOHN PAUL II CLASSICAL SCHOOL | $11,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN BAY | $10,000 |
| SCOUTING AMERICA | $9,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $6,000 |
| HOUSE OF HOPE | $6,000 |
| FREEDOM HOUSE | $5,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| HEAVENS TOUCH MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +59%
- FHFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +17%
- NCNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- JPJOHN PAUL II CLASSICAL SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $4k
- BCBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -37%
- DCDOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building a coalition to create Milwaukee most dynamic neighborhood.
It is the mission of scouting america, greater hudson valley council, inc. to deliver the highest-quality, values-based youth program of character development and leadership training, based upon the precepts embodied in the scout oath and…
The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.scout oath:on my honor, i will do my best to do my duty…
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth
Dedicated to facilitating economic development strategies that promote and secure opportunities for business retention, growth, and the attraction of new industries that create quality jobs for community residents.
Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.
To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.
To nurture, educate and enrich children and youth for life-long success.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of the Bay and Lakes Region Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Brothers Keeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds MY BROTHERS KEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SHORE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Bay City Christian School Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust · De Pere Christian Outreach · Schneider National Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heyrman Construction Co Inc Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.