Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heyrman Construction Co Inc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$537kYouth Development$168kHuman Services$119kHealth$36kHousing & Shelter$32kReligion$10kEmployment$6kCommunity Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST BERNARD CATHOLIC SCHOOL$50,000
GRACE$47,000
BELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSING$30,000
ST JOHN PAUL II CLASSICAL SCHOOL$11,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN BAY$10,000
SCOUTING AMERICA$9,000
HOUSE OF HOPE$6,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$6,000
FREEDOM HOUSE$5,000
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION$5,000
HEAVENS TOUCH MINISTRIES INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $2k → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $2k → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $2k → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $1k → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $500 → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $250 → 10%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$906k · 21 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$906k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-6%

Still filing today

29%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +59%
  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +17%
  • NC
    NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • JP
    JOHN PAUL II CLASSICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • BC
    BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -37%
  • DC
    DOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Side Business Improvement Dist

Building a coalition to create Milwaukee most dynamic neighborhood.

Community Improvement
2
Boy Scouts of America 388 Greater Hudson Valley Council

It is the mission of scouting america, greater hudson valley council, inc. to deliver the highest-quality, values-based youth program of character development and leadership training, based upon the precepts embodied in the scout oath and…

—
3
Pacific Skyline Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
4
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
5
Sioux Council Boy Scouts of America Inc

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.scout oath:on my honor, i will do my best to do my duty…

—
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwestern Wisconsin Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth

—
7
Bay Future Inc

Dedicated to facilitating economic development strategies that promote and secure opportunities for business retention, growth, and the attraction of new industries that create quality jobs for community residents.

Community Improvement
8
Patriots' Path Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.

Youth Development
9
Great Trail Council of Boy Scouts of America Inc

To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Sioux Empire

To nurture, educate and enrich children and youth for life-long success.

Human Services
11
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
12
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of the Bay and Lakes Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is My Brothers Keeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BERNARD CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $218,000 · OtherST BERNARD CATHOLIC SCHOOLBELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSING: $169,000 · OtherBELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSINGGRACE: $127,000 · OtherGRACEYMCA OF GREEN BAY: $52,000 · OtherYMCA OF GREEN BAYBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $47,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAGIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $44,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICAHOUSE OF HOPE: $42,250 · Other+12 more: $125,500 · Other+12 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterMY BROTHERS KEEPER INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesDOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 · Community ImprovementBay City Christian School Inc: $50 · Education
Other$824,750Youth Development$58,000Housing & Shelter$31,500Human Services$7,000Community Improvement$500Education$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $24,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMY BROTHERS KEEPER INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetEAST SHORE INDUSTRIES INC: $6,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MY BROTHERS KEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST SHORE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Bay City Christian School Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust · De Pere Christian Outreach · Schneider National Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heyrman Construction Co Inc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heyrman Construction Co Inc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heyrman Construction’s filings →

    More from the funding graph