Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$87kYouth Development$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$33kHousing & Shelter$23kEducation$19k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$759k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Red Cross$10,000
The Father McKenna Center$8,000
Rock and Roll for Children Foundation$7,500
Sherwood Forest Boys & Girls Club$6,000
SOME$5,000
Georgetown University Lombardi Comp Cancer Center$5,000
Phelan McDermid Syndrome Foundation$5,000
Maryland Therapeutic Riding$5,000
Virginia Tech$4,375
Little Sisters of the Poor$4,000
National Multiple Sclerosis Society$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Promise Landing Farm Inc: $3k → 11%Rock and Roll for Children Fdn: $8k → 8%Promise Landing Farm Inc: $3k → 11%Rock and Roll for Children Foundation: $8k → 8%Little Sisters of the Poor: $5k → 14%Little Sisters of the Poor: $4k → 14%Little Sisters of the Poor: $4k → 14%Little Sisters of the Poor: $4k → 14%Little Sisters of the Poor: $3k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 12 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$279k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+19%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +27%
  • TF
    THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +40%
  • MT
    MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SF
    Sherwoood Forest Boys & Girls Club
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • GU
    Georgetown University Lombardi Cancer Center
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
7
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
8
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
9
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
10
Children's Inn At Nih Inc

The children's inn at nih, inc. (the inn) is a private, nonprofit residence for families and their children who are participating in pediatric research at the national institutes of health's (nih) clinical center. the inn's mission is to…

Health
11
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Therapeutic Riding Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Father Mckenna Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rock and Roll for Children: $25,000 · OtherRock and Roll for ChildrenSOME INC: $23,000 · OtherSOME INCVirginia Tech: $19,375 · OtherVirginia TechSherwood Forest Boys & Girls Club: $17,800 · OtherSherwood Forest Boys & Girls ClubSherwoood Forest Boys & Girls Club: $10,000 · OtherSherwoood Forest Boys & Girls ClubGeorgetown University Lombardi Cancer Center: $5,000 · OtherGeorgetown University Lombardi Comp Cancer Center: $5,000 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $47,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & It…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WA…ROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUND…PROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesPROMISE LANDING FARM INCMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $23,000 · HealthMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RI…PHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $23,000 · HealthPHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROM…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $18,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLER…THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $41,900 · Food & NutritionTHE FATHER MCKE…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education
Other$105,175Human Services$87,500Health$64,000Food & Nutrition$41,900Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $41,900 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSOME INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetPROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds PHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE LANDING FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970’s filings →

    More from the funding graph