Skip to content

Maryland · Private foundation

Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
18%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 11
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$759k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 18% of the organizations Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$62k9%
FY202411$62k18%
FY202310$62k20%
FY202211$57k9%
FY202110$60kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$87kYouth Development$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$33kHousing & Shelter$23kEducation$19k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($82k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Father McKenna Center Inc: $41,900 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMaryland Therapeutic Riding Inc: $23,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSome Inc: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPhelan McDermid Syndrome Foundation: $23,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLittle Sisters of the Poor of Washington DC Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNational Multiple Sclerosis Society: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRock and Roll for Children Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetPromise Landing Farm Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGeorgetown University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 with peer funders

About Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970

How much does Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 give?
Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 reported 11 grants totaling $62,375 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 11 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (28%), Youth Development (17%), Public Safety & Disaster (15%).
Who are Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ($47k), The Father McKenna Center Inc ($42k), Maryland Therapeutic Riding Inc ($23k).
Does Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 18% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 based?
Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970 is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hester M Digges UA DTD 11 2 1970’s filings →

More from the funding graph