Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$948kReligion$555kHuman Services$320kInternational$160kCrime & Legal$120kEducation$35kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEY FOUNDATION OF AUSTIN INC$30,000
WESLEY CAMPUS MINISTRY CENTER$20,000
PROJECT TRANSFORMATION$20,000
THE WESLEY AT MSU TEXAS$10,000
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNITED CAMPUS MINISTRY AT TEXAS STATE$10,000
ST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHRUCH$10,000
METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY$10,000
TCU WESLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
THE WESLEY FOUNDATION AT UTA$10,000
SYNERGY WESLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
DENTON WESLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISSION CENTRAL METROPLEX INC: $20k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL METROPLEX INC: $15k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL METROPLEX INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 18 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-13%

Still filing today

33%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $573k · revenue +37%
  • TH
    Texas Health Resources Foundation
    6× · 2018–2024 · $350k · revenue +37%
  • MJ
    METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUSTIN STREET CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • DF
    DEMENTIA FRIENDLY FORT WORTH OF FUMC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • FU
    First United Methodist Church of
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Richardson Medical Center Foundation

To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to assist Methodist Health System in acquiring state-of-the-art technology, attracting excellent medical staff, and supporting vital hospital…

—
2
Methodist Medical Center Foundation

The Foundation is charged with raising, managing and distributing charitable gift support for Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge (MMC) in order to perpetuate and advance the highest quality of health care services at MMC. Donations to…

Health
3
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
4
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Cleburne

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenville

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southwest Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
7
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
MedHealth

To provide physician services to support the charitable functions and tax exempt purpose of Methodist Hospitals of Dallas (D/B/A Methodist Health System).

Health
9
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
10
Texas Health Specialty Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

—
11
Texas Health Physicians Group

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tcu Wesley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc: $572,657 · OtherDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation IncProject Transformation: $425,000 · OtherProject TransformationUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $275,000 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INCMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $120,000 · OtherMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMCTHE WESLEY FOUNDATION AT UTA: $105,000 · OtherTCU Wesley Foundation: $80,000 · OtherWESLEY FOUNDATION OF AUSTIN INC: $70,000 · Other+16 more: $380,000 · Other+16 moreTexas Health Resources Foundation: $350,000 · HealthTexas Health Re…Power From the SON: $160,000 · InternationalMission Central Metroplex Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesLydia Patterson Institute: $20,000 · Education
Other$2,027,657Health$350,000International$160,000Human Services$45,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc: $572,657 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $350,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPower From the SON: $160,000 over 3y, 94% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $120,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetTCU Wesley Foundation: $80,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetMission Central Metroplex Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLydia Patterson Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Power From the SON ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
  • Who funds TCU Wesley Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mission Central Metroplex Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Lydia Patterson Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003’s filings →

    More from the funding graph