· Private foundation
Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESLEY FOUNDATION OF AUSTIN INC | $30,000 |
| PROJECT TRANSFORMATION | $20,000 |
| WESLEY CAMPUS MINISTRY CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE WESLEY FOUNDATION AT UTA | $10,000 |
| SYNERGY WESLEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TCU WESLEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE WESLEY AT MSU TEXAS | $10,000 |
| TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| UNITED CAMPUS MINISTRY AT TEXAS STATE | $10,000 |
| ST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHRUCH | $10,000 |
| METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY | $10,000 |
| DENTON WESLEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DMDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $573k · revenue +36%
- THTexas Health Resources Foundation6× · 2018–2024 · $350k · revenue +37%
- MJMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC5× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- ASAUSTIN STREET CENTERone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -13%
- DFDEMENTIA FRIENDLY FORT WORTH OF FUMCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- FUFirst United Methodist Church ofone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to assist Methodist Health System in acquiring state-of-the-art technology, attracting excellent medical staff, and supporting vital hospital…
The Foundation is charged with raising, managing and distributing charitable gift support for Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge (MMC) in order to perpetuate and advance the highest quality of health care services at MMC. Donations to…
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
To provide physician services to support the charitable functions and tax exempt purpose of Methodist Hospitals of Dallas (D/B/A Methodist Health System).
Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves, regardless of their ability to pay.
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tcu Wesley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds Power From the SON ↗
- Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
- Who funds TCU Wesley Foundation ↗
- Who funds Mission Central Metroplex Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
- Who funds Lydia Patterson Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hesta Stuart Christian Charitable Xxxxx9003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.