Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hess Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$493k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$547kEducation$444kRecreation & Sports$317kFood & Nutrition$271kHuman Services$271kHealth$248kReligion$212kYouth Development$193kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $367k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LIFE HUB INC$50,000
HOUSE OF HAGAR - SHARE INC$50,000
THE OGLEBAY FOUNDATION$49,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY$47,734
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$43,671
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$30,000
GROW OHIO VALLEY$25,000
CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$25,000
TRIADELPHIA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
VALLEY HOSPICE FOUNDATION$25,000
YWCA WHEELING$22,000
ST ALPHONSUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
WHEELING UNIVERSITY$15,000
WHEELING YMCA$10,000
WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $611k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE LIFE HUB INC: $50k → 15%THE LIFE HUB INC: $50k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $45k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $44k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $40k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $35k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $31k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $30k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $30k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $28k → 15%THE LIFE HUB INC: $25k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $22k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $20k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $18k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $16k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $15k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $15k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $7k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $3k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 31 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
15

Total granted

$3.1M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-7%

Still filing today

61%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $296k · revenue +284%
  • GO
    GROW OHIO VALLEY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $292k · revenue +425%
  • WN
    WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $267k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • OC
    OHIO COUNTY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • WL
    WEST LIBERTY ELEMENTARY PTO
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LC
    LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheeling Mt Zion Cemetery Corporation

Administer and maintain mt zion cemetery as a place of internment or burial in ohio county, wv as well as to promote and protect its historic character and educational value.

—
2
The Childrens Home of Wheeling Inc

To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life

Human Services
3
Wheeling Health Right Inc

To provide charitable, free medical care and pharmaceuticals to residents who fall below federal poverty guidelines and live in ohio, marshall, wetzel and southern brooke counties in west virginia and belmont county in ohio.

Health
4
Wheeling Forward Inc

The organization's mission is to provide guidance and resources to disabled individuals with a focus on educational attainment, employment procurement, health and wellness, community integration, recreation, housing acquisition, and…

Human Services
5
Wheeling Housing Authority Resident Council Incorporated
Community Improvement
6
The Wheelhouse Inc

Alcohol and drug rehabilitation

—
7
Wheeler Mission Ministries Inc

Wmm is a non-denominational, christian, social services organization, which provides christ-centered programs and services for individuals experiencing homelessness and those in need. our vision is to see every individual we serve equipped…

Human Services
8
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
9
The Greater Wheeling Coalition for the Homeless Inc

To advance housing and human services to the homeless and to educate the community on the plight of homelessness in the area.

—
10
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
11
Welty Home for the Aged Inc

The mission of the welty home for the aged, inc. is to own, operate and maintain within the city of wheeling and elsewhere in ohio county, west virginia, facilities having the capacity to provide a full range of secondary healthcare…

Human Services
12
Church On Wheels Inc

To serve the homeless and the impoverished population with nourishing meals, warm showers, and a compassionate environment.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Christian Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSE OF HAGAR - SHARE INC: $277,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HAGAR - SHARE INCFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $138,223 · OtherFRIENDS OF WHEELING INCWHEELING OHIO COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $97,000 · OtherWHEELING OHIO COUNTY HEALTH DEPTOHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $75,000 · OtherOHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYWHEELING UNIVERSITY: $74,138 · OtherVALLEY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $82,734 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INCSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $79,100 · OtherSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INCNAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $47,000 · Other+26 more: $424,000 · Other+26 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $215,671 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTE…CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES W…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $132,400 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTI…LIFE HUB INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesLIFE HUB INC+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $130,600 · EducationWHEELING C…Cornerstone Christian Academy Inc: $104,500 · EducationCornerston…WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $44,500 · EducationWHEELING J…BETHANY COLLEGE: $17,000 · EducationBETHANY CO…OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 · Recreation & SportsOGLEBAY FO…GROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $292,000 · Food & NutritionGROW OHIO…WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $266,600 · Community ImprovementWHEELING …OGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $150,007 · Environment
Other$1,399,195Human Services$611,071Education$296,600Recreation & Sports$296,000Food & Nutrition$292,000Community Improvement$266,600Environment$150,007

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $292,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $266,600 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $215,671 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $150,007 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $138,223 over 6y, 36% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $135,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $132,400 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $130,600 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE HUB INC: $125,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetCornerstone Christian Academy Inc: $104,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $82,734 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $79,100 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetNAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $47,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $44,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC: $20,400 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWebark Estates Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LIFE HUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Christian Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV47× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · James B Chambers Memorial · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc · Eqt Foundation · W E Stone Foundation · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hess Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hess Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hess Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hess Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hess Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph