Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herscher Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$291kEducation$189kHuman Services$119kPhilanthropy$62kHealth$41kCivil Rights$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON HEALTH CARE BOOTCAMP$15,000
CLAY CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING$10,000
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY$10,000
YWCA$7,500
COVENANT HOUSE$7,500
KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE - EQUINOX MEN'S SHELTER$6,000
FESTIVALL$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL$5,000
ARTS AMPLIFIED - GKVF$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $1k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 18%DAYMARK: $3k → 18%DAYMARK: $3k → 18%DAYMARK: $3k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $3k → 18%DAYMARK: $3k → 18%DAYMARK: $2k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $1k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$767k · 32 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
2

Total granted

$767k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+125%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +15%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • TW
    THE WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • CF
    CAMC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +125%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
4
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
5
Voices for Virginia's Children

The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.

Civil Rights
6
West Virginia Healthy Kids and Families Coalition

Work to improve the health of children and families in west virginia through leadership. to provide a forum for diverse organizations to discuss, coordinate and collaborate on issues that improve the health and well-being of west virginia…

Health
7
West Virginia Nonprofit Association Inc

The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…

Public Benefit
8
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
9
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
10
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
11
West Virginia Bar Foundation Inc

Improve the administration of justice and the provision of legal services for west virginia's citizens.

Crime & Legal
12
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The West Virginia Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ymca of Kanawha Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLAY CENTER: $75,000 · OtherCLAY CENTERUNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON HEALTH CARE BOOTCAMP: $55,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON HEALTH CARE BOOTCAMPUNITED WAY: $42,000 · OtherUNITED WAYYWCA: $37,500 · OtherYWCACOVENANT HOUSE INC: $33,500 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE INCSALVATION ARMY: $26,000 · OtherFESTIVALL: $25,000 · OtherTHE WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $25,000 · Other+13 more: $79,900 · Other+13 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $85,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSIT…THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE-BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $11,000 · EducationTHE EDUCATION…LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLIBRARY FO…THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATE…WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $55,000 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRG…CHARLESTON BALLET INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTO…APPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALACHI…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesDAYMARK INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthCAMC FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$498,900Education$96,000Philanthropy$70,000Arts & Culture$68,500Human Services$42,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $55,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $33,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDAYMARK INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDUCATION ALLIANCE-BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHARLESTON BALLET INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMC FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYMARK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE-BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA MEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMC FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Truist West Virginia Foundation IncFL36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · Tgkvf Inc · HB Wehrle Foundation Stephen D Wehrle TTEE · The Strong-Treister Family Foundation · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · Bowles Rice Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herscher Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herscher Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herscher Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Herscher Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herscher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph