Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hermundslie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$767kEducation$141kCivil Rights$90kPublic Benefit$80kHuman Services$72kYouth Development$25kRecreation & Sports$10kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Desert Christian Schools$56,800
4 Tucson$20,000
Goldwater Institute$20,000
Eric Hite Foundation$15,000
Turning Point USA$10,000
Faith Christian Church$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Pioneer$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Navigators$5,000
Romans 12 Ministries$5,000
Center for the Rights of Abused Children$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Eric Hite Foundation: $15k → 15%Eric Hite Foundation: $15k → 15%Eric Hite Foundation: $15k → 15%Eric Hite Foundation: $10k → 15%Eric Hite Foundation: $10k → 15%Eric Hite Foundation: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    Desert Christian Schools Inc
    2× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +60%
  • EH
    ERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $72k · revenue +72%
  • BG
    BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • BS
    Boy Scouts So Arizona Council
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • L
    LUKE5ADVENTURES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
2
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
3
Texas Leadership Summit

Empowering everyday leaders with courage, tools and hope to ignite a revival of christian leadership.

Religion
4
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest

The arizona center for law in the public interest is a non-profit law firm dedicated to ensuring government accountability and protecting the legal rights of arizonans.

Civil Rights
5
Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Inc

The foundation for individual rights and expression's (fire's) mission is to defend and sustain the individual rights of all americans to free speech and free thought-the most essential qualities of liberty.(continued on schedule o)fire…

Civil Rights
6
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
7
In the Gap Inc

Equip and inspire young adults to be positive leaders who model integrity, passionately love jesus christ, and effectively influence children to do the same.

Religion
8
Tucson Values Teachers

To elevate the teaching profession in southern arizona by empowering and celebrating prek-12 teacher excellence through community engagement and investment.

Employment
9
Cultivate Pastors and Churches Inc

The pastoral landscape is strewn with disheartened and burnt-out pastors who have become disillusioned with their profession. many have joined the "great resignation" wave after the covid-19 pandemic and left the ministry. the profession…

Religion
10
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
11
Instituto De Estudios Teologicos

Conference

Education
12
Christian Campus Community

Student events, retreats, meals, conferences focused on spiritual development

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Romans 12 Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

4 TUCSON INC: $633,450 · Religion4 TUCSON INCRomans 12 Ministries Inc: $40,000 · ReligionRomans 12 Ministries IncDesert Christian Schools Inc: $76,800 · OtherDesert Christian Schools …Saguaro Canyon Church: $49,000 · OtherSaguaro Canyon ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…THE NAVIGATORS: $17,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSPatriot Academy: $15,000 · OtherPatriot AcademyPioneer: $15,000 · OtherPioneerBoy Scouts So Arizona Council: $11,000 · OtherFaith Christian Church Campus Ministries: $10,000 · OtherFAITH CHRISTIAN CHURCH INC: $10,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $90,000 · EducationERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC: $72,449 · Human ServicesBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $70,000 · Public BenefitMENTORING TUCSON'S KIDS: $13,056 · Youth DevelopmentONE-ON-ONE MENTORING INC: $1,346 · Youth DevelopmentLUKE5ADVENTURES: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN: $2,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Religion$673,450Other$273,300Education$90,000Human Services$72,449Public Benefit$70,000Youth Development$14,402Recreation & Sports$10,000Civil Rights$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget4 TUCSON INC: $633,450 over 6y, 25% of budgetCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $90,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetDesert Christian Schools Inc: $76,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC: $72,449 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRomans 12 Ministries Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetMENTORING TUCSON'S KIDS: $13,056 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetLUKE5ADVENTURES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE-ON-ONE MENTORING INC: $1,346 over 1y, 14% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 4 TUCSON INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Desert Christian Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds ERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Romans 12 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING TUCSON'S KIDS ↗
  • Who funds LUKE5ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ONE-ON-ONE MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hermundslie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hermundslie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hermundslie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph