Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herman and Sharon Frankel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$432kArts & Culture$293kHealth$54kReligion$26kEducation$10kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$239k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$5,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$3,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$749k · 25 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$749k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+78%

Still filing today

24%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $95k · revenue +22%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +69%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • AT
    ASOLO THEATRE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $91k · revenue +25%
  • JS
    JEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +78%
  • CI
    CISV INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue ×38
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home of Rochester

To improve the health, well being, and quality of life of our jewish community's elderly, as well as that of our general community, being mindful of the values implicit in our jewish heritage.

Health
2
Jewish Home of Rochester Senior Housing Inc

Jewish home of rochester senior housing (the summit), provides independent living, enriched housing and other related services to residents, as well as long-term care services in conjunction with jewish home of rochester. the summit…

Human Services
3
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
4
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
6
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
7
Jas Non-Profit Housing Corporation Vi

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
8
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
9
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
10
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
11
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
12
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Senior Life Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cisv International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VENICE: $400,000 · OtherGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VENICEIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $25,850 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITAL: $23,500 · Other+15 more: $45,600 · Other+15 moreDETROIT OPERA: $104,580 · Arts & CultureDETROIT OPERADETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCASOLO THEATRE INC: $91,332 · Arts & CultureASOLO THEATRE INC+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $20,000 · HealthJEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJARC: $2,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 · Human ServicesCISV INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentALLUVIUM INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $500 · International
Other$524,950Arts & Culture$292,912Health$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$2,200Youth Development$1,500International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT OPERA: $104,580 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASOLO THEATRE INC: $91,332 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJARC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT OPERA ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds ASOLO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds CISV INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLUVIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herman and Sharon Frankel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herman and Sharon Frankel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herman and Sharon Frankel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph