How much did HERITAGE OF PRIDE INC grant in FY2023?

Civil Rights$157kHuman Services$102kHealth$46kEducation$46kArts & Culture$43kRecreation & Sports$17kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$15kPublic Benefit$8kOther$201k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

advocacyequalitylargestpowerlegalqueer theaterjustice

2020

verifiedunderstandingissuesindianawarenesstechplatform

2021

blackhealth

2022

highestproductsfields hematologyhematology bloodblood bankingbanking transfusiontransfusion medicine

2023

workinglearningactivitiesgives backbuildingchangeyouth

2025

gives back

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k5 grants · $38k
$10k–50k4 grants · $53k

$8,000

Median grant

States reached

$941k

Total assets

Largest grants

Out My Closet Inc$18,700
The Pride Network - Newark$14,000
Caribbean Equality Project Inc$10,000
NYC Gaymers Inc$10,000
TransNewYork Inc$8,000
South Asian Lesbian and Gay Association$8,000
Trans formative Schools Inc$8,000
Ballroom We Care Inc$8,000
Gotham Volleyball League Inc$5,900

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$180k · 4 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +112% since the first grant, against +92% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$180k

$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%

+92%

Still filing today

100%

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OM
Out My Closet Inc
2× · 2022–2023 · $37k · revenue +112%
NY
NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER
2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +72%
NQ
National Queer Theater
2× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +258%

Funded once

BQ
BLACK QUEER TOWN HALL
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -80% · 44% of their budget
NL
National LGBTQ Task Forcegraduated
one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +31%
I
INTERPRIDEgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +178%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Gays and Lesbians in a Transgender Society

Services&supportforthelgbtqia+population

—

The Gala Pride and Diversity Center

The gay and lesbian alliance of the central coast supports and empowers people of all sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions to strengthen and unite our central coast community.

Unclassified

Gender Equality New York Inc

Our mission is to support transgender, gender non-binary,and intersex (TGNBI) New Yorkers and their families. Our mission is to educate, advocate, connect, and empower in order to bring equality and justice across New York.

Human Services

Lgbtq Leaders in Higher Education

Education and civic services

Community Improvement

Brooklyn Pride Inc

to produce PRIDE and community events

Civil Rights

National Trans Bar Association

Education

Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering

Working together as a community to empower Trans People of Color by meeting needs and increasing accessibility

Human Services

Global Action for Trans Equality Inc

Gate is an international advocacy organization committed to promoting justice and equality for trans and gender diverse communities.

Civil Rights

Newburgh Lgbtqia Center

provide support & resources for LGBTQ POC

Human Services

Center for Immigrant Protection aka

The LGBT Asylum Project reaches underrepresented, marginalized communities who would otherwise be unable to access high-quality legal support and representation. Our clients originate from countries that are known for extreme and violent…

Crime & Legal

Nytag Inc

Nytag advocates for more inclusive gender-based policies that benefit transgender and gender non-conforming/non-binary (tgncnb) individuals through building community leaders,educating practitioners, and influencing policy makers.

Civil Rights

Imperial Court of Los Ageles Hollywood

Community services

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for Trans Equality Education and the most unlike its peers is New York Blood Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/36

the rest of the field

10,118/120,724

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/32

Grantees still filing

25/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$239,000Civil Rights$156,500Human Services$101,900Health$45,500Education$45,500Arts & Culture$42,500Recreation & Sports$16,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stonewall Community FoundationNY20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stonewall Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · Horizons Foundation · Lgbt Charities Inc · Leonard Litz Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Give Lively Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HERITAGE OF PRIDE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BLACK QUEER TOWN HALL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 863564292 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BLACK QUEER TOWN HALL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Heritage of Pride Inc?

Find your warmest path to Heritage of Pride Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HERITAGE OF PRIDE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Heritage of Pride Inc?

More from the funding graph

HERITAGE OF PRIDE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Heritage of Pride Inc?

More from the funding graph