· Public charity
Heritage of Pride Inc
Heritage of pride works toward a future without discrimination where all people have equal rights under the law.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $101,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $117,186 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,936 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RUSA LGBT CORP | $10,000 |
| NEWARK PRIDE INC | $10,000 |
| TRANSCEND CHORAL & COMMUNITY MUSIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NYC DISORDERS OF SISTERS | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION | $10,000 |
| OUT MY CLOSET INC | $10,000 |
| CARIBBEAN EQUALITY PROJECT INC | $9,250 |
| TRANS FORMATIVE SCHOOLS INC | $8,000 |
| LGBT CENTER INTERCULTURAL COLLECTIVE INC | $8,000 |
| LOVE WINS | $8,000 |
| FOLSOM STREET EAST | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OMOUT MY CLOSET INC3× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue +112%
- NYNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +61%
- LCLGBT CENTER INTERCULTURAL COLLECTIVE INC2× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- BQBLACK QUEER TOWN HALLone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -80% · 44% of their budget
- NLNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCEone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -18%
- IINTERPRIDEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people
The organization spread awareness on and advocate for the rights of LGBT people in Iraq through providing training producing publications providing direct services and other activities
Our mission is to support transgender, gender non-binary, and intersex (TGNBI) New Yorkers and their families. Our mission is to educate, advocate, connect, and empower in order to bring equality and justice across New York.
To educate, celebrate, promote self-empowerment and ensure that the social and cultural needs of LGBTQ+ individuals and families are met throughout the Atlanta Metropolitan area.
EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…
Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.
To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.
The mission of translatina network is to gain equal and lasting rights for all latina transgender women at a local, state and federal level. through the effective social mobilization of our community, we will have direct involvement in…
to produce PRIDE and community events
Our mission is to support the autonomy of Black LGBTQ+/SGL people, communities, and families by building community,changing hearts and minds, and advancing social justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immigration Equality and the most unlike its peers is Inreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK QUEER TOWN HALL ↗
- Who funds OUT MY CLOSET INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRIDE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RUSA LGBTQ CORP ↗
- Who funds INTERPRIDE ↗
- Who funds THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CARRIBEAN EQUALITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LGBT CENTER INTERCULTURAL COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds National Queer Theater ↗
- Who funds TRANS FORMATIVE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERMENT ENTERPRISE II ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION EQUALITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OUT CYCLING INC ↗
- Who funds IN REACH INC ↗
- Who funds IM FROM DRIFTWOOD ↗
- Who funds TRANSCEND CHORAL & COMMUNITY MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR NYC LTD ↗
- Who funds New York City Parents of Lesbians and Gay Men Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds FOLSOM STREET EAST INC ↗
- Who funds BALLROOM WE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds LOVEWINS ↗
- Who funds TransNewYork ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds INREACH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSEINC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stonewall Community Foundation · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Tides Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · The New York Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heritage of Pride Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.