Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert Kong Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$114kEducation$20kInternational$10kYouth Development$2kEnvironment$800Health$600Philanthropy$550
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$560
Median grant
5
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Venture Christian Church$18,000
Calvary Christian Academy$3,300
The Christian and Missionary Allian$2,227
St Jude Children's Research Hospita$1,200
All World Mission Prayer Center AWM$1,000
Monterey Bay Aquarium$560
Filoli$500
World Vision$469
Chinese Church in Christ South Vall$300
Glimmers Childhood Cancer Foundatio$295
Samaritans Purse$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $360) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ISHIMWE CENTER: $360 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$167k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOME CHURCH INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $69k
  • VC
    VENTURE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2022–2026 · $60k
  • CM
    CHRISTA MCAULIFFE PARENT FACULTY GROUP
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue -52%

Funded once

  • DW
    Dreams Will Come True Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $800 · revenue -99%
  • A
    AWMPC
    one grant, 2021 · $600
  • GH
    GRAYSTONE HOME & SCHOOL CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $550 · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
2
Global Academy Foundation % Walter Link
Philanthropy
3
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
4
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
5
The Adtalem Global Education Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Gilchrist Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Creative Minds International Public Charter School

The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.

Education
10
Young Global Leadership Foundation

Global education programs

—
11
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
12
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Trimension Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOME CHURCH INC: $69,240 · OtherHOME CHURCH INCVENTURE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $60,400 · OtherVENTURE CHRISTIAN CHURCHThe Christian and Missionary Allian: $7,227 · OtherCalvary Christian Academy: $5,035 · Other+13 more: $7,855 · OtherCHRISTA MCAULIFFE PARENT FACULTY GROUP: $13,786 · EducationCHRISTA MCA…THE KING'S ACADEMY: $4,017 · EducationTHE KING'S …+1 more: $550 · EducationWORLD VISION INC: $3,909 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 · HealthMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $1,060 · AnimalsISHIMWE CENTER: $960 · Human ServicesGLOBAL TRIMENSION IMPACT FOUNDATION: $550 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $260 · Religion
Other$149,757Education$18,353International$3,909Health$1,800Animals$1,060Human Services$960Philanthropy$550Religion$260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTA MCAULIFFE PARENT FACULTY GROUP: $13,786 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KING'S ACADEMY: $4,017 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $3,909 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $1,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISHIMWE CENTER: $960 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDreams Will Come True Foundation: $800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAYSTONE HOME & SCHOOL CLUB: $550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL TRIMENSION IMPACT FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 11% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTA MCAULIFFE PARENT FACULTY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISHIMWE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dreams Will Come True Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSTONE HOME & SCHOOL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRIMENSION IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert Kong Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert Kong Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert Kong Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph