· Private foundation
Herbert A & Iva B Grant Charitable
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of Herbert A & Iva B Grant Charitable’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Newmarket Fire and Rescue | $7,000 |
| Newmarket Community Church | $6,000 |
| Seacoast School of Technology | $5,000 |
| Hero Pups | $4,000 |
| Friends of the Newmarket Library | $4,000 |
| RaymondFremont End 68 Hours of Hunger | $3,000 |
| Northern Light Health Foundation | $3,000 |
| Rockingham Nutrition and Meals on Wheels | $3,000 |
| Newmarket Police Relief Association | $3,000 |
| Austin 17 House | $3,000 |
| Paul Memorial Library (aka Friends of Newfields Public Library) | $3,000 |
| Epping Bible Baptist Church | $3,000 |
| Assistance Canine Training Services (ACTS) | $3,000 |
| Seacoast Eat Local | $2,000 |
| Newmarket Community Education Partnership | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASSISTANCE CANINE TRAINING SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +645%
- HPHERO PUPS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +78%
- CACOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of New Hampshireone grant, 2021 · $4k
- NENewmarket Elementary Schoolone grant, 2020 · $2k
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW HAMPSHIRE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish of New Hampshire Inc and the most unlike its peers is Austin 17 House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSISTANCE CANINE TRAINING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HERO PUPS INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Light Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Seacoast Community Health ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds New Generation Inc ↗
- Who funds Austin 17 House ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST EAT LOCAL INC ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREAT BAY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEWMARKET COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERSHI ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Exeter Hospital Inc · A Caring Community Inc · Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation · The Bauman Family Foundation Inc · Granite United Way · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Herbert A & Iva B Grant Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.