· Private foundation
Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
- $250k+1 grant · $391k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SLA FOUNDATION | $390,978 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD | $25,000 |
| AVESTA HOUSING | $10,000 |
| WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE - A | $10,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD | $10,000 |
| RED'S GOOD VIBES | $10,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| GORDON COLLEGE - EMILY ESTERS | $5,000 |
| VOUCHERS FOR VETERANS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| FAMILIES IN TRANSITION | $5,000 |
| LOCKER PROJECT | $5,000 |
| HOME POSSIBLE PROJECT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SEEDS OF HOPE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $561k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGranite State Dog Recovery2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +77%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +363%
- NHNEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- CPContributions Paidone grant, 2024 · $205k
- WTWAYPOINT - TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $10k
- CCCOOPERATIVE CU ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
To provide plans of care comprised of thoughtfully integrated services that help those with varied abilities live, learn, work, and play throughout their lifetimes.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upreach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sla Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds REDS GOOD VIBES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC ↗
- Who funds Granite State Dog Recovery ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds AVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND DISABLED SPORTS ↗
- Who funds Footprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CROSSROADS INC ↗
- Who funds LIL IGUANAS CHILD SAFETY FOUND ↗
- Who funds MALLEY FARM FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds APEX YOUTH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds Locker Project ↗
- Who funds THE HOME POSSIBLE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds VOUCHERS FOR VETERANS ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · A Caring Community Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Foundation for Seacoast Health · Granite United Way · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · First Seacoast Community Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Federal Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Aspire Living & Learning Inc — 35% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.