Skip to content
Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$329kInternational$194kHealth$118kPublic Benefit$67kHuman Services$37kEnvironment$20kPhilanthropy$16kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $74k
$34,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAWFARE PROJECT INC$40,000
PARKINSONS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$34,000
OPENDOR MEDIA$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 58% of grant dollars ($458k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 42% that went abroad ($330k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THORN: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 42% of all-years giving ($330k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$330k · 16 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$673k · 12 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$673k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+45%

Still filing today

42%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PARKINSONS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $152k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    THE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $141k · revenue +160%
  • UI
    UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL OF CANADA INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $124k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO
    one grant, 2017 · $81k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE AGO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $29k
  • IA
    INTUIT ART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
National Center for Jewish Filminc

The national center for jewish film is a unique, independent nonprofit motion picture archive, distributor, resource center and exhibitor. ncjf's ongoing mission is the collection, preservation and exhibition of films with artistic and…

Arts & Culture
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
8
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
9
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
12
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parkinsons Research and Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARKINSONS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $151,600 · OtherPARKINSONS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCTHE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC: $141,300 · OtherTHE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INCUNITED ISRAEL APPEAL OF CANADA INC: $124,000 · OtherUNITED ISRAEL APPEAL OF CANADA INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO: $81,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIOINUIT ART FOUNDATION: $57,400 · OtherINUIT ART FOUNDATIONCOMMENTARY MAGAZINE INC: $38,100 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE AGO INC: $28,500 · OtherHARBOURFRONT CENTRE FOUNDATION: $26,900 · Other+10 more: $69,800 · Other+10 moreTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC: $78,100 · InternationalTHE LAWFARE P…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC: $22,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…+1 more: $1,800 · InternationalFirst Light Foundation: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSTON SWING DANCE SOCIETY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHORN: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $5,050 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Chabad Niagara Inc: $1,000 · ReligionCornell University: $1,000 · Education
Other$718,600International$101,900Arts & Culture$29,500Human Services$10,000Religion$6,050Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKINSONS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $151,600 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC: $141,300 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC: $78,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFirst Light Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOWELL NATURE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLACASA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHORN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SWING DANCE SOCIETY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herb & Cece Schreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herb & Cece Schreiber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home