Skip to content

Oregon · Private foundation

Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$82,400
Largest grant, FY2025
$82,400
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$82k0%
FY20231$10k0%
FY20225$60k0%
FY20215$75k0%
FY20208$70k13%
FY201911$77k55%
FY20187$79k14%
FY20177$77kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$523kFood & Nutrition$4kCommunity Improvement$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
1000 Friends of Oregon$167,40044%
Central Oregon Landwatch$86,50072%
Landwatch Lane County Inc$47,000415%
Friends of the Columbia Gorge Land Trust$32,00041%
Thrive Hood River$11,50043%
Friends of the Columbia Gorge$5,00010%
Friends of French Prairie$4,0002n/a
Friends of Douglas County$2,0001n/a
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild$2,0001n/a
Columbia Insight$1,0001n/a
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
1000 Friends of Oregon$167,40044%
Central Oregon Landwatch$86,50072%
Landwatch Lane County Inc$47,000415%
Friends of the Columbia Gorge Land Trust$32,00041%
Thrive Hood River$11,50043%
Friends of the Columbia Gorge$5,00010%
Friends of French Prairie$4,0002n/a
Friends of Douglas County$2,0001n/a
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild$2,0001n/a
Columbia Insight$1,0001n/a
The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts$1,00010%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($170k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Burning Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Earth Day Oregon · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Lazar Foundation · Jubitz Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund with peer funders

About Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund

How much does Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund give?
Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund reported 1 grants totaling $82,400 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (99%), Food & Nutrition (1%), Community Improvement (0%).
Who are Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: 1000 Friends of Oregon ($167k), Central Oregon Landwatch ($87k), Landwatch Lane County Inc ($47k).
Does Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Oregon Community Foundation, The Burning Foundation, The Collins Foundation.
Where is Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund based?
Henry Richmond Land Use Defense Fund is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry Richmond Land Use Defense’s filings →

More from the funding graph