Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry Logan Children's Home Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$387kHealth$285kYouth Development$231kEducation$217kArts & Culture$212kRecreation & Sports$149kCivil Rights$119kCrime & Legal$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $174k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$35,000
VOICES FOR CHILDRENCASA$30,515
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WV$27,500
THE ARC OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY$20,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOVE INC$15,000
PARKERSBURG AND WOOD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$15,000
PARKERSBURG ART CENTER$10,900
CIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY$10,078
WOOD COUNTY SOCIETY$10,000
GRAND CENTRAL CHURCH OF CHRIST$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PARKERSBURG RECREATION FISHING DERBY$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $14k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $9k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $9k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$1.7M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-24%

Still filing today

41%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wood County Society Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +71%
  • TA
    The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +62%
  • NS
    NORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +844%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue -27%
  • MW
    MISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • WR
    WESTBROOK RESPITE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation

To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.

—
3
West Virginia Nonprofit Association Inc

The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…

Public Benefit
4
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
5
Wetzel County Center for Children and Families Inc

Provide programs and services that support & strengthen Wetzel County famiilies thru interagency coordination, collaboration and communication. communication.

Human Services
6
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
7
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
8
Washington County Arts Council Inc

Promotes the arts and related activities at local, state and national levels

—
9
The Arc of Central Virginia

The organization serves persons who are intellectually or developmentally disabled, their families, and the community in planning district xi.

—
10
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
11
Central Wv Community Action Assoc Inc

Central west virginia community action association, inc.s mission is to provide pathways to economic independence for all families by leading community initiatives that address the root causes of poverty.

—
12
Wetzel-Tyler Child Advocacy Center

To reduce the traumatic effects of abuse, protect children from maltreatment, seek justice for child victims, investigate abuse and strengthen the communitys awareness.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission West Virginia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Circles Campaign of Mov Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WV: $278,343 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WVVOICES FOR CHILDRENCASA: $250,754 · OtherVOICES FOR CHILDRENCASAThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc: $138,000 · OtherThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley IncNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $101,078 · OtherNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INCWOOD COUNTY RECREATION COMMISSION: $75,000 · OtherWOOD COUNTY RECREATION COMMISSIONWVUP FOUNDATION: $62,500 · OtherPARKERSBURG SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL BAND: $50,122 · OtherPARKERSBURG & WOOD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $43,490 · Other+19 more: $258,056 · Other+19 moreParkersburg Art Center Inc: $89,770 · Arts & CultureParkersburg A…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $76,900 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MU…THE MID-OHIO VALLEY SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MID-OHIO …MISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMISSION WEST …+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWood County Society Inc: $145,600 · HealthWood Coun…COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $51,737 · Human ServicesCIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF MOV INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesSW RESOURCES INC: $51,000 · EmploymentWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$1,257,343Arts & Culture$217,670Health$145,600Human Services$87,737Employment$51,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWood County Society Inc: $145,600 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc: $138,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $101,078 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetParkersburg Art Center Inc: $89,770 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $76,900 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $51,737 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSW RESOURCES INC: $51,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF MOV INC: $36,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA: $29,290 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWOOD COUNTY HIST & PRES SOC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wood County Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Parkersburg Art Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SW RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLES CAMPAIGN OF MOV INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MID-OHIO VALLEY SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds MISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOD COUNTY HIST & PRES SOC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc)WV36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Deitzler Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · United Way Alliance of the Mid-Ohio Valley Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry Logan Children's Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry Logan Children's Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henry Logan Children's Home Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Henry Logan Children's Home Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry Logan Children's Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph