Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry G Sims & Henry U Sims Mem Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$112kEducation$110kHuman Services$83kCrime & Legal$71kReligion$25kYouth Development$15kEmployment$14kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$3,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$953k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUMBERLAND SCHOOL OF LAW$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDAT$10,000
SIGHT SAVERS AMERICA$3,700
LAKESHORE FOUNDATION$3,700
WORKSHOPS INC$3,600
KINGS HOME$3,600
RESTORATION ACADEMY$3,600
PRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC$3,600
UAB CENTER FOR LOW VISION REHABILITATION$3,600
GLENWOOD INC$3,600
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ALABAMA$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ALABAMA: $2k → 19%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND: $2k → 19%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ALABAMA: $2k → 19%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ALABAMA: $2k → 19%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ALABAMA: $2k → 19%NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND: $2k → 19%KINGS HOME: $4k → 7%KINGS HOME: $4k → 7%KINGS HOME: $4k → 7%KINGS HOME: $4k → 7%KING'S HOME: $4k → 7%KING'S HOME: $3k → 7%KING'S HOME: $3k → 7%KING'S HOME: $3k → 7%KING'S HOME: $2k → 7%YWCA - CENTRAL ALABAMA: $8k → 16%YWCA - CENTRAL ALABAMA: $8k → 16%YWCA - CENTRAL ALABAMA: $6k → 16%YWCA - CENTRAL ALABAMA: $6k → 16%YWCA - CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 20 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$473k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-3%

Still filing today

55%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $71k · revenue +78%
  • SS
    SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +34%
  • LF
    LAKESHORE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • UC
    UAB CENTER FOR LOW VISION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Central Alabama

Goodwill industries provides training and employment for handicapped persons.

Employment
2
Special Olympics Alabama Inc

Provide year-round sports training & athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate courage,…

—
3
Alabama Christian Academy

To glorify god by providing a quality, christ-centered education which challenges students and teachers to maximize their potential so that graduates are prepared to further their education while becoming productive christian citizens.

—
4
Alabama Lions Sight Association Inc

The Association's Mission is to fund quality eye treatment for the medically indigent of Alabama. Services provided include providing glasses, surgeries, anesthesia, medically necessary contact lenses, prosthesis, tests and eye medication.

Health
5
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
6
The Bridge Inc

To provide treatment and rehabilitative services for juveniles and adults in alabama through contracts primarily with the alabama department of youth services and the alabama department of mental health.

Health
7
Crestwood Day School Inc

Crestwood day school is a private elementary (k-6th) grade school in alabama.

Education
8
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
9
The Arc of Alabama Inc

The arc of alabama provides services to aid individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the state of alabama.

—
10
Central Alabama Works

To facilitate implementation of workforce development programs andservices that support economic and job development in the region andthat address the workforce needs of existing businesses and industry.

—
11
The Arc of Tuscaloosa

The mission of the Arc of Tuscaloosa County is to provide activities to persons residing in Tuscaloosa County who have developmental or intellectual disabilities, which enable the individual to maintain previously acquired skills/behaviors…

Human Services
12
Alabama Aerospace & Aviation High School

The mission of the school is to prepare students for leadership positions in the aerospace and aviation industries through a rigorous, authentic, industry-aligned aerospace and defense education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hand in Paw Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Restoration Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUMBERLAND SCHOOL OF LAW: $79,450 · OtherCUMBERLAND SCHOOL OF LAWIndividual grant recipient: $36,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYWCA: $21,000 · OtherYWCAWORKSHOPS INC: $14,588 · OtherWORKSHOPS INCGLENWOOD INC: $14,000 · OtherGLENWOOD INCIndividual grant recipient: $13,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESTORATION ACADEMY: $10,800 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $8,100 · OtherGLENWOOD MENTAL HEALTH: $7,838 · Other+5 more: $23,438 · Other+5 moreUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $71,350 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LA…PRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $19,900 · EducationPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCH…THE RESTORATION ACADEMY: $14,588 · EducationTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY+1 more: $2,100 · EducationYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $32,700 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRI…Kings Home Inc: $28,988 · Human ServicesKings Home IncNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF ALABAMA: $14,400 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FEDERATI…SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $29,188 · HealthSIGHT SAVERS …LAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $29,188 · HealthLAKESHORE FOU…THE WORKSHOPS INC: $14,400 · EmploymentHAND IN PAW INC: $5,738 · Animals
Other$229,264Education$107,938Human Services$76,088Health$58,376Employment$14,400Animals$5,738

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $71,350 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $32,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $29,188 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $29,188 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKings Home Inc: $28,988 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $19,900 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY: $14,588 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WORKSHOPS INC: $14,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF ALABAMA: $14,400 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetGLENWOOD INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN PAW INC: $5,738 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTROY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
  • Who funds SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Kings Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESTORATION ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE WORKSHOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN PAW INC ↗
  • Who funds TROY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry G Sims & Henry U Sims Mem Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry G Sims & Henry U Sims Mem Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry G Sims & Henry U Sims Mem Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph