Skip to content

· Public charity

Henry & Louise Timken Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the function of, and to carry out the purpose of stark community foundation.

$280k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$647kArts & Culture$342kHuman Services$168kCommunity Improvement$120kScience & Tech$110kPhilanthropy$100kYouth Development$39kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $272,156, the rows itemized in this filing. The $280,156 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $107k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$107,222
STARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$28,275
ARTSINSTARK$27,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$25,000
STARK COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE$25,000
CANTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$15,000
TUSLAW LIONS CLUB$13,675
STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,984
NORTH CANTON CARES PANTRY$10,000
EVERSIGHT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $40k → 13%EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 13%HANNAH'S HOUSE 119: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$898k · 10 repeat orgs$725k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$898k
$656k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2018–2024 · $103k · revenue +29%
  • MA
    MILITARY AVIATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $100k · revenue +53%
  • CB
    COMMUNITY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP OF STARK COUNTY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CC
    CANTON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -28%
  • HB
    HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +33%
  • JR
    J R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canton Regional Chamber of Commerce

Advancement of the economic, industrial, professional, cultural and civic welfare of stark county and its surrounding region and the promotion and preservation of the competitive free enterprise system.

—
2
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
3
Starke County Economic Development Foundation Inc

Economic development in starke county

—
4
Stark County Manufacturing Workforce Development Partnership

SCMWDP supports Stark County manufacturers' growth and expansion by offering seamless career pathways, delivering inclusive training and education, and sharing best practices within the manufacturing workforce development community:…

Employment
5
Stark County Farm Bureau

To improve the economic well being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life.

—
6
Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau

The Mission of the Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau is to attract and engage visitors, serve and educate regional tourisim partners, and generate economic growth for the community through travel and tourism development.

—
7
United Way of Greater Stark County

We build our community's capacity to alleviate the impact of poverty and empower families to unleash their potential.

Philanthropy
8
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
9
Stark Housing Network Inc

Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.

Human Services
10
Sandusky State Theatre Inc

The sandusky state theatre was originally created in 1928 and was reinvented several times since its inception. the arts, particularly the performing arts, are a reflection and a documentation of our culture and society. therefore, in…

Arts & Culture
11
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
12
Homeless Outreach Team of Stark Cou

Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Canines Helping Independent People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
18/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $286,168 · EducationSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INCCANTON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationCANTON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOLKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,984 · EducationSTARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $103,132 · Arts & CultureSTARK COUNTY HISTORIC…MILITARY AVIATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $100,000 · Arts & CultureMILITARY AVIATION PRE…ARTS IN STARK: $70,460 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARKCanton Symphony Orchestra Association: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCanton Symphony Orche…+2 more: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 moreJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH: $75,000 · OtherJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACHPATAGONIA SCHOOLS: $50,000 · OtherPATAGONIA SCHOOLSTotal Living Center: $28,000 · OtherTotal Living CenterLOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $25,000 · OtherLOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $24,584 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INCTHE HUB GALLERY AND STUDIOS: $18,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · OtherCANINES HELPING INDEPENDENT PEOPLE: $35,000 · OtherCANINES HELPING INDEPENDENT P…Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $25,000 · OtherStark County Hunger Task Forc…Fore Stark County Youth Development Inc: $34,000 · OtherFore Stark County Youth Devel…Hammer & Nails Inc: $30,000 · OtherHammer & Nails IncGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $17,000 · Other+7 more: $72,875 · Other+7 moreCOMMUNITY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP OF STARK COUNTY INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementSTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyEXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Science & TechYMCA of Central Stark County: $40,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesHannah's House 119: $8,609 · Human Services
Education$547,152Arts & Culture$323,592Other$449,459Community Improvement$130,000Philanthropy$100,000Science & Tech$100,000Human Services$73,609

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $286,168 over 4y, 16% of budgetSTARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $103,132 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetSTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANTON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $100,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILITARY AVIATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP OF STARK COUNTY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetEXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH: $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $70,460 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANINES HELPING INDEPENDENT PEOPLE: $35,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetFore Stark County Youth Development Inc: $34,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetHammer & Nails Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCanton Symphony Orchestra Association: $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTotal Living Center: $28,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetStark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $24,584 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC: $13,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,984 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH CANTON CARES PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEversight: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEN-RICH-MENT: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WORKSHOPS INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH58.6× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry & Louise Timken Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry & Louise Timken Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henry & Louise Timken Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Henry & Louise Timken Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry & Louise Timken’s filings →

    More from the funding graph