Skip to content
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan

The Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan strives to improve the quality of life for all people affected by hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, other coagulation disorders, and related complications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.8M
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $928,938, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,108,294 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $179,356 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $516k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $413k
$46,155
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michigan State University$98,325
University Pediatricians$76,537
Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center$73,085
Regents of the University of Michigan$59,095
Cincinnati Children's Hospital$53,165
Karmanos Cancer Institute$52,740
Research Institute of Nationwide Children's$48,936
University of Cincinnati$47,867
Akron Children's Hospital$46,155
Henry Ford Health Systems$45,563
Promedica Toledo Hospital$45,091
Munson Medical Center$43,948
Bronson Methodist Hospital$41,816
Dayton Children's Hospital$41,518
Ohio State University$41,187
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $56k → 7%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $79k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $77k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $133k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 21%Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center: $73k → 16%DAYTON CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $48k → 14%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $67k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $56k → 16%MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $53k → 7%University Pediatricians: $77k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $66k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $131k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $91k → 21%INDIANA HEMOPHILIA AND THROMBOSIS: $60k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $61k → 15%Cincinnati Children's Hospital: $53k → 16%MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $51k → 7%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $72k → 8%Regents of the University of Michigan: $59k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $124k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $80k → 21%INDIANA HEMOPHILIA AND THROMBOSIS: $52k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $49k → 16%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $71k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $57k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $117k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $80k → 21%INDIANA HEMOPHILIA AND THROMBOSIS: $52k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $59k → 15%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $68k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $52k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $113k → 16%Karmanos Cancer Institute: $53k → 21%INDIANA HEMOPHILIA AND THROMBOSIS: $50k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $57k → 15%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $65k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $52k → 14%Michigan State University: $98k → 16%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $65k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $51k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $95k → 16%UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $54k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $50k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $83k → 16%NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $52k → 15%Research Institute of Nationwide Children's: $49k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 21 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
0

Total granted

$6.8M
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $552k · revenue +34%
  • MM
    MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +39%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +69%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Children's Physicians

    Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

    Health
    2
    Mclaren Northern Michigan

    Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

    Health
    3
    Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

    Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

    Health
    4
    Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

    Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

    Health
    5
    Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

    Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

    Health
    6
    Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

    Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

    Health
    7
    Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

    Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

    Health
    8
    Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

    To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

    Health
    9
    University Family Physicians Inc

    Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

    —
    10
    Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

    To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

    Health
    11
    Rush Copley Medical Center

    To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

    Health
    12
    Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

    Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Ohio State University Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/14
    Grantees still filing
    8/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $551,720 · HealthUNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANSINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INC: $414,173 · HealthINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INCLEGACY CHM: $389,749 · HealthLEGACY CHMMUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $374,698 · HealthMUNSON MEDICAL CENTERHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $324,867 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $316,930 · HealthTHE TOLEDO HOSPITALDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $301,814 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $286,935 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGANBronson Methodist Hospital: $159,471 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $158,045 · HealthAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $153,615 · HealthWEST MICHIGAN CANCER CENTER: $138,817 · HealthMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $894,534 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $464,586 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $421,391 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $323,064 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INCHurley Medical Center: $291,000 · OtherHurley Medical CenterUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $276,678 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIKarmanos Cancer Institute: $261,046 · OtherKarmanos Cancer InstituteUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $192,758 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $103,250 · Education
    Health$3,570,834Other$3,125,057Education$103,250

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS: $551,720 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $421,391 over 9y, 26% of budgetINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INC: $414,173 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLEGACY CHM: $389,749 over 5y, 20% of budgetMUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $374,698 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $324,867 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $316,930 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $301,814 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $286,935 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBronson Methodist Hospital: $159,471 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $158,045 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $153,615 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN CANCER CENTER: $138,817 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $103,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS ↗
    • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds INDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds LEGACY CHM ↗
    • Who funds MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER ↗
    • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
    • Who funds THE TOLEDO HOSPITAL ↗
    • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
    • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
    • Who funds Bronson Methodist Hospital ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
    • Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds WEST MICHIGAN CANCER CENTER ↗
    • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Thrombosis a…Cystic Fibrosis Found…Fidelity Investments …
    American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $978k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home