Skip to content

· Public charity

Helping Hands Network Inc

To benefit charities involved with children and young adults with special needs

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$555kRecreation & Sports$281kReligion$38kEducation$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $245,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $265,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$55,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION$60,000
KESHET$60,000
HELP HOPE GIVE$55,000
THE HEARTS PLAYBOOK$35,000
MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER$20,000
LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP HOPE GIVE: $55k → 6%THE HEARTS PLAYBOOK: $35k → 15%MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 8%KESHET: $150k → 14%HELP HOPE GIVE: $29k → 6%THE HEARTS PLAYBOOK: $20k → 15%MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 8%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $63k → 14%HELP HOPE GIVE: $20k → 6%HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 8%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $61k → 14%MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $15k → 8%KESHET: $60k → 14%MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $15k → 8%KESHET: $60k → 14%MYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $15k → 8%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $60k → 14%GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%KESHET: $58k → 14%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $58k → 14%KESHET: $55k → 14%KESHET: $50k → 14%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $50k → 14%NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $30k → 14%KESHET: $19k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE: $10k → 14%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS: $15k → 14%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS: $13k → 14%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS: $12k → 14%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 6 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-5%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K
    KESHET
    7× · 2019–2025 · $451k · revenue +44%
  • HI
    HELPHOPELIVE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $104k · revenue +35%
  • EH
    Endeavor Health Clinical Operations
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -11%
  • GI
    GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
2
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
5
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
6
Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

—
7
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Endeavor Health Medical Group

Endeavor Health Medical Group (EHMG) follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
10
Harold E Eisenberg Foundation

The foundation's objective is to fund breakthrough gastrointestinal (gi) cancer research, including clinical trials and studies, at the robert h. lurie comprehensive cancer center of northwestern university.additionally, another objective…

Philanthropy
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Kessler Foundation Inc

Kessler Foundation advances rehabilitation research that leads to real-world solutions for people with disabilities, creating new possibilities for restoring function, promoting independence, and improving quality of life. We envision a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KESHET: $451,000 · OtherKESHETMERKOS LINYONEI CHINUCH LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS INC: $52,500 · OtherMERKOS LINYONEI CHINUCH LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF ILLINOIS INCMYRA RUBENSTEIN WEIS HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 · Other+3 more: $30,000 · OtherNSSRA FOUNDATION: $321,500 · Recreation & SportsNSSRA FOUNDATIONTHE HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEY: $19,734 · Recreation & SportsTHE HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEYHELPHOPELIVE INC: $103,557 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE IN…Endeavor Health Clinical Operations: $55,000 · HealthEndeavor Health…COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 · Education
Other$563,500Recreation & Sports$341,234Health$158,557Philanthropy$65,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKESHET: $451,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetNSSRA FOUNDATION: $321,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $103,557 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEY: $19,734 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds NSSRA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGHLAND PARK GIANTS HOCKEY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helping Hands Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helping Hands Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helping Hands Network Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Helping Hands Network Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helping Hands Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph